Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Unisoc T7200 (T606)

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

Unisoc T7200 (T606)

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200 (T606)

The Unisoc T7200 (formerly Unisoc T606) is an entry level octa core SoC with two big ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.6 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.6 GHz. The SoC further includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an LPDDR4X 1600 MHz memory controller, an ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU at 650 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 12nm FinFET process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 435Unisoc T7200 (T606)
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1400 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
FeaturesAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505ARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (7%)     max: 9345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (11%)     max: 1352 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
370 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
1364 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
min: 637     avg: 663     median: 666 (7%)     max: 691 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
577 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
2308 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (2%)     max: 3314 Points
min: 2228     avg: 11490     median: 12397 (9%)     max: 13705 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (14%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
435 +
27 Points (5%)
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
155928 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (11%)     max: 238808 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (15%)     max: 82626 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 221540     avg: 245262     median: 245367 (8%)     max: 290675 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 79973     avg: 81151     median: 81069 (2%)     max: 82324 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
7100 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (39%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (12%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (8%)     max: 25251 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 (T606) → 240% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 08:10:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753855829s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.013s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.025s ... 0.044s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.064s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)