Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) vs Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 430

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (SD430) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X6 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 150 Mbps (downstream) and 75 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). 

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa

► remove from comparison Samsung 7870 Octa

The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced in February 2016 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores, which are manufactured in a modern 14-nm process. Compared to the previous 28-nm-SoCs, the performance was increased and the power consumption is 30 % lower according to Samsung. The integrated LZE Cat.6 modem reaches transfer rates of up to 300 Mbps (downstream) and 50 Mbps (upstream). The dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR3-1866 RAM.

The graphics adapter ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (core clock of 700 MHz according to Wikipedia) is also used in combination with the HiSilicon Kirin 650 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.2, it also supports OpenCL 1.2 as well as DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). The performance is sufficient for common Android games from 2016 at medium details.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A53A53
Series: Exynos A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 7880 compare1.9 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Clock1400 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology28 nm14 nm
FeaturesAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 4, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARM Mali-T830 GPU, 8x Cortex-A53 1.6 GHz, LTE Cat.6, 14 nm, dual-channel memory controller LPDDR3-1866
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11467 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11005 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
430 +
min: 8253     avg: 9093     median: 9045 (8%)     max: 10364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
430 +
min: 1064     avg: 1195     median: 1193.5 (14%)     max: 1338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
430 +
min: 1072     avg: 1195     median: 1200.5 (14%)     max: 1333 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
430 +
min: 619     avg: 657     median: 658.5 (7%)     max: 685 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
430 +
min: 2222     avg: 2553     median: 2552.5 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
430 +
min: 613     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (9%)     max: 644 Points
min: 680     avg: 696     median: 682 (9%)     max: 726 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
430 +
min: 1706     avg: 1896     median: 1895.5 (5%)     max: 2085 Points
min: 3277     avg: 3285     median: 3284.5 (8%)     max: 3292 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4169 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
753 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
430 +
min: 10396     avg: 12677     median: 13194 (15%)     max: 14709 ms
min: 6784     avg: 9156     median: 9670 (11%)     max: 11916 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
430 +
min: 2604     avg: 3194     median: 3293.5 (3%)     max: 3438 Points
min: 3721     avg: 4164     median: 3880 (3%)     max: 4968 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
430 +
min: 24     avg: 41.7     median: 29 (6%)     max: 72 Points
min: 31     avg: 31.5     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 32 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
430 +
min: 42798     avg: 45027     median: 44963.5 (15%)     max: 47066 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
430 +
min: 3999     avg: 4992     median: 4792 (15%)     max: 6830 Points
min: 4775     avg: 5190     median: 5140.5 (16%)     max: 5703 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
430 +
min: 14313     avg: 16454     median: 16194 (20%)     max: 17949 Points
min: 15443     avg: 16057     median: 16019 (20%)     max: 16745 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
430 +
min: 8556     avg: 9082     median: 9083 (3%)     max: 9583 Points
min: 8143     avg: 8405     median: 8393.5 (3%)     max: 8688 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
430 +
min: 14989     avg: 26579     median: 27811 (17%)     max: 28218 Points
min: 31778     avg: 32396     median: 32448 (20%)     max: 32911 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
430 +
min: 44992     avg: 56835     median: 58282 (10%)     max: 59990 Points
min: 61794     avg: 62047     median: 61818 (11%)     max: 62758 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
430 +
917 min (17%)
min: 669     avg: 719     median: 718.5 (14%)     max: 768 min
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
430 +
1783 Points (9%)
min: 2016     avg: 2023     median: 2024 (11%)     max: 2030 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
430 +
3256 Points (7%)
min: 3440     avg: 3508     median: 3536 (8%)     max: 3549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
430 +
min: 3408     avg: 3668     median: 3636 (24%)     max: 3892 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
430 +
min: 3347     avg: 4577     median: 4689 (23%)     max: 5290 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa → 116% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 11:31:03

#0 checking url part for id 8169 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8118 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8169 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#7 got single benchmarks 8169 +0.061s ... 0.087s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8118 +0.003s ... 0.091s

#9 got single benchmarks 8118 +0.027s ... 0.118s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.157s ... 0.275s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.31s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)