Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-4110M vs Intel Core i3-4000M

Intel Core i3-4110M

► remove from comparison Intel 4110M

The Intel Core i3-4110M is a middle-class dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q2 2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.6 GHz and includes no Turbo Boost support.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i3-4110M is about as fast as the former Sandy Bridge model i5-2450M and can handle all typical office and multimedia tasks as well as more demanding software.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1100 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

The i3-4110M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 14-inches or greater.

Intel Core i3-4000M

► remove from comparison Intel 4000M

The Intel Core i3-4000M is a middle-class dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q2 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.4 GHz and includes no Turbo Boost support.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i3-4000M is about as fast as the former Sandy Bridge model i5-2410M.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1100 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

The i3-4000M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 14-inches or greater.

ModelIntel Core i3-4110MIntel Core i3-4000M
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i3
CodenameHaswellHaswell
Series: Core i3 Haswell
» Intel Core i3-4110M2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4000M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4005U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4110M2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-4000M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4005U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Clock2600 MHz2400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP37 Watt37 Watt
Transistors960 Million960 Million
Technology22 nm22 nm
Die Size130 mm2130 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketrPGArPGA
FeaturesHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$225 U.S.$225 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core i3 4110MIntel Core i3 4000M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4000M +
min: 236     avg: 239.8     median: 240 (2%)     max: 243 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4000M +
min: 91     avg: 94.2     median: 95 (29%)     max: 96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4000M +
min: 2.55     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (4%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4000M +
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (3%)     max: 1.08 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 4000M +
min: 3542     avg: 3570     median: 3581 (29%)     max: 3588 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 4000M +
min: 7994     avg: 8049     median: 8042 (9%)     max: 8111 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 4000M +
min: 10239     avg: 10315     median: 10329 (8%)     max: 10361 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 4000M +
min: 4651     avg: 4662     median: 4664 (25%)     max: 4669 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 4000M +
min: 631     avg: 649     median: 635 (8%)     max: 682 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 4000M +
min: 19.91     avg: 20.6     median: 20 (4%)     max: 22 s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 4000M +
min: 15     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (6%)     max: 15.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 4000M +
min: 78     avg: 79.1     median: 79.1 (19%)     max: 80.2 fps
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 4000M +
3098 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 4000M +
min: 15.78     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.1 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 4000M +
min: 35.79     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (2%)     max: 35.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 4000M +
min: 799     avg: 808     median: 802 (4%)     max: 824 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 4000M +
41500 MIPS (20%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 4000M +
31000 MFLOPS (24%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 4000M +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 4000M +
min: 8115     avg: 8398     median: 8398 (8%)     max: 8681 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 4000M +
min: 3054     avg: 3176     median: 3161 (9%)     max: 3304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 4000M +
min: 25742     avg: 28030     median: 27649 (18%)     max: 30127 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 4000M +
min: 2404     avg: 2484     median: 2496 (6%)     max: 2525 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 4000M +
min: 3405     avg: 3491     median: 3526 (7%)     max: 3576 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 4000M +
4298 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 4000M +
2024 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4000M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 27. 06:36:55

#0 checking url part for id 5883 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4216 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.013s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5883 +0s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 5883 +0s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4216 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 4216 +0.017s ... 0.032s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.046s

#66 return log +0.004s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)