Review Asus G73JW Notebook (GTX 460M)

Florian Glaser, 10/03/2010

Powered by Fermi. Asus' 17-inch gaming notebook G73 is soon to feature NVidia's brand new high-end graphics card, the GeForce GTX 460M. Thanks to a pre-released version we have been able to extensively review the upgraded G73JW.

Review: Asus G73JW Notebook

Up till now Asus has been offering the G73 only with the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 from ATI, but soon the option of having the GeForce GTX 460M will mean more freedom for customers.  Nvidia's new DirectX 11 firecracker competes with the Radeon HD 5870 not only on the level of performance, but its additional features (including PhysX and 3D Vision) definitely score it some points.  So that we could get a real feel for the GeForce GTX 460M, Asus was kind enough to place at our disposal the not-quite-final "PR sample" of the G73JW, which in addition to the GeForce GTX 460M graphics card also came equipped with an Intel Core i7-720QM, 12 GB DDR3 RAM as well as two speedy hybrid hard disks each with 500 GB.  Since we've already tested the G73 twice before and the exterior - except for a few details (USB 3.0 Port, HDMI 1.4) - has remained the same, we have left the sections "Case," "Input Devices," and "Connectivity" out of this review.

Display

Wie wir testen - Display

It's only fair that such a high-end notebook would have an HD screen.  That's why Asus has fitted the G73JW with a 17-inch Full HD Display with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 and an aspect ratio of 16:9.  This in combination with a built-in Blu-Ray drive means that film buffs will really get their money's worth.  The relatively high resolution also has the benefit of reducing the amount of scrolling necessary with many open windows.  Moreover, the GeForce GTX 460M is one of the few notebook graphics cards that can actually keep up with demanding resolutions like 1920 x 1080 while running games.

198.0
cd/m²
203.0
cd/m²
187.7
cd/m²
179.0
cd/m²
178.5
cd/m²
172.5
cd/m²
175.4
cd/m²
175.0
cd/m²
174.0
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Information
Maximum: 203.0 cd/m²
Average: 182.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 178.5 cd/m²
Black: 0.19 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1

Once again, the panel is luckily the Hannstar HSD173PUW1, which already generated a lot of buzz as the display for the full HD version of the G73JH with Radeon HD 5870.  Thanks to the excellent black level of 0.19 cd/m², dark areas do not noticeably drift into the gray range, rather they are rendered as crips blacks. The contrast ratio of 939:1 is at a very high level as well, colors appear extremely vivid.  Also, a brightness distribution of 85% leaves nothing to complain about.   The brightness  itself is the only thing that could be better.  An average of 182.6 cd/m² is typical for  office work and just right for internet use, but games and films would really be more enjoyable at a higher screen brightness.

Bright Screen Content
Bright Screen Content
Dark Screen Content
Dark Screen Content

Not only the heavy weight of four kilograms and the 17-inch screen but also the strong reflectivity of the display makes the G73 not too transportation-friendly, let alone good for outdoor use.  At indirect viewing angles the very glossy screen surface often leads to distracting reflections even indoors.

The surprisingly good range of viewing angles, however, evens things out a bit.  In the horizontal plane, colors and brightness only get distorted when looking at the screen from fairly large angles off to the side.  Tilting the screen back and forth  results in poor picture quality more quickly.  Most notebooks are, nonetheless, worse off in this respect.

Viewing Angles: Asus G73JW
Viewing Angles: Asus G73JW

Performance

Before we get into the details about the hardware and its performance, an important mention: our "PR sample" from Asus is strictly a pre-production model.  According to Asus, the models offered to the public will "definitely have less RAM (4 or 8 GB instead of 12)  a higher CPU clock rate (740QM instead of 720QM)."  Additionally, "software installation, bios and the exhaust fan controller" are not quite final and could be fundamentally changed. 

Turbo Mode
Turbo Mode

Processor: Core i7-720QM

Our test model incorporates the Core i7-720QM processor with a quad core, which has also been used in other G73 models.  Thanks to 774 million transistors and a 6 MB L3-cache, the processor possesses an extraordinarily high performance potential.  The clock rate of 1.60 GHz is indeed quite low, but the Turbo Boost Technology can raise the speed to a maximum of 2.80 GHz.  Asus has additionally fitted the G73 with its own overclocking feature "Twin Turbo,"  which raises the clock rate some more.  Whether the performance actually improves in response to these features is a question that's answered in more detail in the "CPU Performance" section. 

Furthermore, you have the option of including the Core i7-720QM with hyperthreading technology.  This allows the simultion of four additional CPU cores, which is primarily advantageous in optimized applications.  Gaming with hyperthreading is, however, still very limited.  The greatest downside of the Core i7-720QM is the very high energy consumption of 45 watts.

5.9
Windows 7 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
7.1
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
7.5
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
6.9
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
6.9
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.9

Graphics Card: GeForce GTX 460M

So that Nvidia fans get their money's worth, Asus has decided to offer the G73 not only with the option of the Radeon HD 5870 but from now on with the (Fermi) GeForce GTX 460M.  The specifications are really something impressive.  For starters, the 1536 MB GDDR5 video memory with a 192 Bit connection sidesteps the problem of to-be-saved data getting bottlenecked and holding up processing, which is the case for the Radeon HD 5650.  The clock rates, however, add up to only 675 MHz for the core, 1250 MHz for the memory and 1350 MHz for the shader.  Additionally, the 192 unified shaders add to the guarantee of a satisfactory performance.

The list of features of the GeForce GTX 460M is also quite impressive, which supports Optimus (automatic switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics cards - not possible with the G73JW) as well as PhysX (GPU-based physics accelerator), not to mention the required DirectX 11.  CUDA and DirectCompute, on the other hand, are designed to make general computations.  Purevideo HD (decoding high-resolution content) and 3D Vision (rendering three-dimensional content - accessories required) are also mentioned as additional features. 

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ Graphics
Systeminfo GPUZ
System Properties Asus G73JW

CPU Performance

The Core i7-720QM scores some points with its outstanding performance thanks to its modern and efficient architecture.  Its 3733 points in single-core rendering and 10,097 points in multi-core rendering correspond to just about the same level as other notebooks with the Core i7-720QM according to the Cinebench R10 tool.  After activating the Twin Turbo Mode, the clock rate rises from 1.73 to 1.85 GHz under heavy use, which increases the performance measurably: the processor showed an 8% higher performance (totaling 4015 points) in single-core rendering and an increase of an entire 9% in multi-core rendering (totaling 11032 points). 

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4352 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4015 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
11032 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
35.68 fps
Help
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Dell Latitude ST-LST01 (min)
 Z670, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600
0.22
   ...
Sony Vaio VPC-F12Z1E/BI
 740QM, GeForce GT 330M
3.16
Sony Vaio VPC-Z23N9E/B
 2640M, Radeon HD 6650M
3.17
MSI GX660R
 740QM, Mobility Radeon HD 5870
3.18
Asus G73JW
 720QM, GeForce GTX 460M
3.18
HP EliteBook 8570w B9D05AW-ABD
 3360M, Quadro K1000M
3.2
Eurocom W860CU Cougar
 740QM, Radeon HD 6970M
3.2
Lenovo B5400 MB825GE
 4200M, GeForce GT 720M
3.21
   ...
Eurocom Panther 5D (max)
 E5-2697 v2, Quadro K5100M
17.6
PC Mark
PCMark Vantage5804 points
Help
PCMark Vantage in comparison
Sony SV-S1311G4E (min)
 2350M, HD Graphics 3000
811
   ...
Asus N55SL-S1016V
 2450M, GeForce GT 635M
5786
Samsung 900X1B-A02
 2357M, HD Graphics 3000
5787
Fujitsu LifeBook AH552/SL
 3210M, HD Graphics 4000
5792
Asus G73JW
 720QM, GeForce GTX 460M
5804
Lenovo IdeaPad S400-MAY8LGE
 3317U, HD Graphics 4000
5812
Lenovo ThinkPad T400s
 SP9600, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
5816
Sony Vaio VPC-EH1Z1E/B
 2410M, GeForce 410M
5818
   ...
One K56-3F (max)
 4700MQ, GeForce GT 750M
23558

GPU Performance

In order to more meaningfully rate the GeForce GTX 460M, we've chosen to compare it with the Asus G73JH (with Radeon HD 5870).  The first surprise came in the 3DMark 05, in which the GeForce GTX 460M came in on top of the Radeon HD 5870 by 9% (19452 to 17928 points).  The tables were turned in the 3DMark 06, when the GeForce GTX 460M was outdone by the Radeon HD 5870, by 2% mind you (12520 to 12802 points).  The gap widened in the 3DMark Vantage, when the GeForce GTX 460M was beaten by a whole 9% (7366 to 8044 points).  In the end, not too much could be gathered from the synthetic graphics benchmarks.  So, what do the numbers show in actual gaming?  More about that in a bit...

3D Mark
3DMark 0334673 points
3DMark 0519452 points
3DMark 06
 1280x1024
12520 points
3DMark Vantage7366 points
Help
Hybrid hard drive
Hybrid hard drive

Hard Drive

The G73JW comes with the option of having a so-called SSH drive.  This is a combination of a conventional HDD (7200 RPM) with a 4 GB SSD, onto which  frequently-used data is stored.  Such hybrid hard disks should reach the performance level of an HDD with 10,000 RPM.  Our test model came with two 500 GB SSH drives which together offer a great storage capacity of 1 TB.  Thanks to the SSH, start and loading times of the operating system and programs seem shorter than with typical HDDs.  Hybrid drives, of course, can't quite keep up with a single fast-paced SSD.  The tool CrystalDiskMark recorded for the SSH drive a sequential read rate of 89.91 MB/sec and a sequential write rate of 93.01 MB/sec.

Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS
Transfer Rate Minimum: 19.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 96.8 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 73.3 MB/s
Access Time:
Burst Rate: 86.9 MB/s
DPC Latency Checker
DPC Latency Checker Asus G73JW: Hohe Werte bei Benutzung der Touchpadtasten

Latency

Improvements are still needed in the area of latency.  Indeed, the typical response rate was just fine, under 500 µs.  But as soon as we pressed the touchpad buttons, latency shot up to over 4000 µs.  It appeared that not all the kinks have been worked out with the touchpad driver.  Latency values this high in audio or video transmission can under some circumstances lead to skipping.

Gaming Performance

Wie wir testen - Leistung

In contrast to the application benchmarks, there was a slight decrease detected in gaming performance as soon as the Twin Turbo Mode was activated.  For this reason, we performed all the gaming tests without the built-in overclocking feature. Regardless, the GeForce GTX 460M was placed in direct competition not only with ATI's Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (MSI GX640) and Radeon HD 5870 (MSI GX740, Asus G73JH & Deviltech 9700 DTX), but also had to stand its ground against two models from Asus as well, particularly the old top-level model GeForce GTX 285M (MSI GT660 & mySN XMG8.c) and the new premium model GeForce GTX 480M (Clevo W881CU & Clevo D901F).  All the benchmarks mentioned in the text below were produced under the resolution of 1920 x 1080.

Mafia 2

Whether Mafia 2 is a worthy sequel to the uncommonly successful and highly decorated first part of the gangster epic is currently debated.  At any rate, the GeForce GTX 460M made out well in the integrated benchmark of Mafia 2.  Even with very high graphics settings in place as well as 16x AF (anisotropic filtering), the average refresh rate of the screen stayed within the playable range (34 fps).  GeForce GTX 285M and GeForce GTX 480M run the game a bit more smoothly at 37 fps and 41 fps respectively.

Mafia 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080high, 0xAA, 16xAF33.9 fps
 1360x768high, 0xAA, 16xAF51.2 fps

Dirt 2

This racing game comes with DirectX 11 support and works especially well with the graphics cards of the GeForce GTX 400 series.  The G73JW is capable of running the game at a fluid 42 fps with high graphics settings and 4x AA (antialiasing).  At this rate, the GeForce G73JW passes up its brothers with Radeon graphics cards, the Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 and the Radeon HD 5870, which both run the game at 32 fps.  However, the GeForce GTX 480M lands on top with 47 fps.

Colin McRae: DIRT 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080Ultra Preset, 4xAA41.6 fps
 1360x768High Preset, 2xAA73.8 fps

Crysis

The time-honored but still very resource-demanding Crysis pushes the GeForce GTX 460M to the limit.  With very high graphics settings (no AF or AA), the game still runs at 13 fps, rendering it completely unplayable.  The competition is also having a hard time bringing Crysis to the laptop screen with halfway fluid motion.  With the GeForce GTX 285M (14 fps), Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (16 fps), GeForce GTX 480M (16 fps) and Radeon HD 5870 (17 fps), the first-person shooter appears equally slow.  There's no way around this but to switch down the graphics settings to "high" or "moderate" (depending on resolution). 

Crysis - GPU Benchmark
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080Very High, 0xAA, 0xAF13 fps
 1024x768High50.7 fps

StarCraft 2

To be able to enjoyably play an RTS, 30 fps is usually enough.  In the intro of the ambitious challenge "For the Swarm", we measured the frame rate of the GeForce GTX 460M at very high graphics settings to be 32 fps.  Compare: GeForce GTX 285M and GeForce GTX 480M outdid our model at 33 fps and 37 fps respectively.

StarCraft 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080ultra31.6 fps
 1360x768high68.4 fps

Metro 2033

Next to Crysis and GTA IV, most notable is Metro 2033 for computation-intensive games.  Thanks to this, the first person shooter looks very sharp with very high graphics settings, DirectX 11 mode, AAA (Analytical Antiailiasing) and 4x AF.  But the meager 10 fps restricts even the thought of smooth game progression.  The GeForce GTX 460M seems overwhelmed with these settings, and a refresh rate of 12 fps is nothing close to ideal.

Metro 2033
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080Very High DX11, AAA, 4xAF9.6 fps
 1600x900High DX10, AAA, 4xAF25.2 fps

Shift

Just like Colin McRae Dirt 2, Need for Speed Shift is also one of the games that due to its technical specifications tends to lean toward Nvidia graphics cards.  With a refresh rate of 44 fps with high graphics settings, the GeForce GTX 460M surpasses not only the GeForce GTX 285M (39 fps) and the Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (40 fps), but even the Radeon HD 5870 (42 fps).  Nevertheless, the GeForce GTX 480M is yet again in a league of its own at 52 fps.

Need for Speed Shift
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080all on/high, 4xAA, triliniarAF43.8 fps
 1366x768all on/high, 4xAA, triliniarAF68 fps

Bad Company 2

If you want to lead the boys of Bad Company safely through the picturesque levels of the game in a full HD resolution, you'll have to either forego detail-enhancing settings or fall back on lower graphics settings.  The refresh rate of 29 fps, a result of high graphics settings (HBOA on), 4x AA and 8x AF, can get on your nerves after a while.  With a GeForce GTX 285M in your notebook, the frame rate drops a bit further (26 fps).  Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (31 fps) and Radeon HD 5870 (32 fps) can hardly do any better.  The exception, as always, is the GeForce GTX 480M, which manages the same demanding graphics settings at 38 fps.

Battlefield: Bad Company 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080high, HBAO on, 4xAA, 8xAF29 fps
 1366x768high, HBAO on, 1xAA, 4xAF54.2 fps

Risen

If you don't mind a shaky frame rate, then you can play the RPG Risen with high graphics settings and 4x AF enjoyably enough.  At 28 fps, the GeForce GTX 460M ranks in a bit below the Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (29 fps), the GeForce GTX 285M (30 fps) as well as the Radeon HD 5870 (32 fps).  Once more, the GeForce GTX 480M undisputedly takes first place with 36 fps.

Risen
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080high/all on, 0xAA, 4xAF28 fps
 1366x768all on/high, 4xAF42.6 fps

Modern Warfare 2

Finally, we let the GeForce GTX 460M loose on the ever-popular Modern Warfare 2.  The first-person shooter from Infinity Ward is, at 41 fps, luckily quite playable with very high graphics settings and 4x AA.  The GeForce GTX 460, however, draws the shortest straw against the GeForce GTX 285M (43 fps) and the GeForce GTX 480M (49 fps).  Since Modern Warfare 2 tends to run better on ATI graphics cards, Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (47 fps) and Radeon HD 5870 (50 fps) each rank well.

CoD Modern Warfare 2
 ResolutionSettingsValue
 1920x1080all on/max vsync off, textures extra, 4xAA41.3 fps
 1366x768all on/high vsync off, high textures, 4xAA58.5 fps

Gaming Summary

All in all, the GeForce GTX 460M shows a very good performance.  Other than with extremely demanding games like Crysis or Metro 2033, the DirectX 11-supporting high-end graphics card is powerful enough to run modern games in a high resolution with high graphics settings.  Even antialiasing and anisotropic filtering can be activated without making most games unplayable.  The Asus G73JW has no chance against powerful desktop PCs, but as far as notebooks go, it falls into the top echelon.  Compared with the competition, the GeForce GTX 460M ranks in between the Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 and the Radeon HD 5870 - a respectable feat

All things considered, we compiled the following rankings:

1920 x 1080 | (very) high graphics settings:

1st Place: GeForce GTX 480M (+21%)

2nd Place: Radeon HD 5870 (+4%)

3rd Place: GeForce GTX 460M

4th Place: Radeon HD 5850 GDDR5 (-1%)

5th Place: GeForce GTX 285M (-6%)

low med.high ultra
Crysis - GPU Benchmark (2007) 50.713fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark (2007) 47.412.2fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2 (2009) 73.841.6fps
Need for Speed Shift (2009) 6843.8fps
Risen (2009) 42.628fps
CoD Modern Warfare 2 (2009) 58.541.3fps
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 (2010) 54.229fps
Metro 2033 (2010) 25.29.6fps
StarCraft 2 (2010) 68.431.6fps
Mafia 2 (2010) 51.233.9fps

Emissions

System Noise

As mentioned earlier, the exhaust fan controller might undergo some changes for the finished product.  According to our test model, the G73JW measures up very close to the G73 version with the Core i7-720QM und Radeon HD 5870 (see review).  Under normal use (office, internet, etc.) both fans seem fairly quiet, occasionally making an audible swooshing noise.  Under heavy use (games, 3D applications, etc.), the background noise increases to a clearly audible level.  Nevertheless, the G73JW runs a good deal more quietly that many comparable gaming notebooks (for example MSI GX740).  This impression is likely attributable to the pleasant sound of the fan, which always seemed constant and never distracting.

Noise Level

Idle 33.5 / 33.5 / 34.3 dB(A)
HDD 34.1 dB(A)
DVD 37.0 / dB(A)
Load 41.5 / 44.8 dB(A)
 
    30 dB
silent
40 dB
audible
50 dB
loud
 
min: , med: , max:     (15 cm distance)
Temps Idle
Temps Idle
Temps Last
Temps Volllast

Temperature

The highlight of the G73JW is without a doubt the stunningly low case temperature.  What particularly impressed us was the notebook's cooling ability under normal use, where neither the top nor the bottom half of the case exceeded a temperature of  31ºC.  Under heavy use, parts of the case reached a temperature as high as 40ºC, but the palm rest remained well below at a comfortably cool 26ºC (max.).  On the whole, the G73JW stays about 2-4ºC cooler than the G73JH with Core i7-720QM and Radeon HD 5870.  A big improvement for this model is the palm rest temperature, which was recorded to be 10ºC higher in the G73JH-TZ014V review.

Now you'd guess that at least the hardware itself has to exhibit higher temperatures.  But far from it!  Even pushing the hardware to the limit for hours using the tools Furmark and Prime only raises the processor and graphics card temperature to 72ºC - an exceptionally good value.  Under normal use, the hardware also stays appropriately cool at around 40ºC for the CPU and GPU.

Max. Load
 37.1 °C40.3 °C38.2 °C 
 30.8 °C38.9 °C38.7 °C 
 22.1 °C25.2 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
35.4 °C36.2 °C35.1 °C
32.7 °C34.6 °C28.7 °C
23.4 °C24.4 °C21.7 °C
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Average: 30.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C

User Temperature Tests

Thanks to Aleš Stojak we got some infrared shots of his G73JW-TZ083V (i7-740QM, GTX 460M, Seagate 750 GB und Corsair Force 3 SSD). The first 4 images show the laptop after 3 hours of full load (using Prime95 and FurMark). The second set of four images shows the device after 3 hours of idle (3% avg CPU load). The images come from a Fluke Ti9 (emission set to 0.95) at 22°C room temperature.

3h load bottom
3h load bottom
3h load exhausts
3h load exhausts
3h load power brick
3h load power brick
3h load keyboard
3h load keyboard
3h idle bottom
3h idle bottom
3h idle exhausts
3h idle exhausts
3h idle power brick
3h idle power brick
3h idle keyboard
3h idle keyboard
EAX 5.0
EAX 5.0

Speakers

If you don't want to have to hook your notebook up to external speakers to get decent sound quality, then the Asus G73JW is right for you.  The integrated 2.1 combo, of course, can't quite match the precision, volume and authenticity of a balanced sound system, but the sound quality is, nonetheless, well above average for a notebook.  Particularly the high maximum volume is not to be found with any of its competitors.  Additional highlights include supported THX Surround Sound and EAX 5.0.  EAX (Environmental Audio Extensions) is developed by the sound specialists at Creative and can - among other things - simultaneously produce the sound for up to 128 instrument parts.  The list of games that support EAX is extensive, including many popular titles like Assassin's Creed, Bioshock and Mass Effect. 

Battery Life

Readers Test
Maximum battery life (Readers Test)
Classic Test
Minimum battery life  (Classic Test)

A key disadvantage of powerful hardware is its high energy consumption.  Although Asus has fitted the G73JW with the relatively powerful 8-cell battery (75Wh), the battery life is rather short-lived under any and all conditions.  Starting with the Classic Test of the Battery Eater tool, heavy use with the brightness turned all the way up and all energy saving features deactivated resulted in the battery getting exhausted after a mere 68 minutes.  Watching movies with the power cord unplugged is hardly possible when the battery lasts about 1.5 hours (max. brightness, moderate energy saving settings).  Surfing the internet with Wi-Fi (max. brightness,  moderate energy saving settings) will get you little more than 2 hours away from a power source.  Reducing the brightness to the lowest level and activating all energy saving settings increases the battery life only slightly, coming to exactly 2.5 hours according to the Readers Test of the Battery Eater tool.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
2h 30min
WiFi Surfing
2h 16min
DVD
1h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 08min

In terms of energy consumption, our tests revealed several differences between the G73JW (GTX 460M) and the G73JH (HD 5870).  While the GeForce GTX 460M consumes 28.4-38.6 watts under normal use, the model with Radeon HD 5870 has a far higher value of 38.2–54.4 watts.  The tables turn under heavy use as G73JH utilizes 102.6–145.2 compared to 133.1-149.0 watts for the G73JW.  Our guess: the GeForce GTX 460M is more efficient under light use than the Radeon HD 5870, but on the other hand burns up more energy under heavy use.  

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Idle 28.4 / 30.5 / 38.6 Watt
Load 133.1 / 149.0 Watt
 
Key: min: , med: , max:         

Verdict

Asus G73JW
Asus G73JW (Bild Asus)

Besides the USB 3.0 port, the GeForce GTX 460M and optional hybrid hard drive, everything has stayed the way it was in the previous model.  Far-reaching changes are, however, not necessary considering that the G73 is a fundamentally excellent gaming notebook.  Thanks to its outstanding performance, the sharp display, comfortable keyboard and touchpad as well as above-average sound quality and relatively low temperature and noise output, the G73 can qualify as a full-fledged desktop replacement.  Due to its heavy weight and generous dimensions, the 17-inch notebook is not really very transport-friendly.  Nevertheless, thanks to its unique design and extraordinarily sharp display, jealous glances in your direction come guaranteed.

Like the phrase says, "nobody's perfect."  So, upon close inspection it's easy to find fault with one aspect or another.  Most notable in this light would be the lacking variety of ports.  The fact that Asus held out on an ExpressCard reader as well as a Firewire and eSATA port is baffling at such a high price.  At the same time, when you closely consider the situation, the last two above-mentioned ports will most likely be replaced by the USB 3.0 sooner or later.

By and large, the Asus G73 has truly earned a very good rating of 88%.  For those looking for a powerful gaming notebook with excellent features which can also serve as a desktop replacement, the G73 would be a near-perfect companion.

Now, whether to choose a model with Radeon HD 5870 or with GeForce GTX 460M,  is a question of personal preferences.  Those looking for relatively unrestricted (gaming) performance are better off with the G73JH (HD 5870).  For users that, however, want supported features like PhysX, the G73JW (GTX 460M) might be a better match.

Asus G73JW (Bild Asus)
Asus G73JW (Bild Asus)
In Review: Asus G73JW
In Review: Asus G73JW

Specifications

Asus G73JW

:: Processor
Intel Core i7-720QM 1.6 GHz @ 1.85 GHz (Intel Core i7)
:: Mainboard
Intel HM55 Express Chipset
:: Memory
12288 MB, DDR3, 1333 MHz
:: Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M - 1536 MB, Core: 675 MHz, Memory: 1250 MHz, Shader Clock Rate: 1350 MHz, GDDR5, 259.12
:: Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel, LED Backlight, Hannstar HSD173PUW1, glossy: yes
:: Harddisk
Seagate Momentus XT ST95005620AS, 500 GB 7200 rpm 2 Hybrid Hard Disks Totaling 1000 GB
:: Soundcard
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Ibex Peak PCH
:: Connections
3 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headphone Jack, Microphone Output, Card Reader: 8-in-1,
:: Networking
Atheros AR8131 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit), Atheros AR9002WB-1NG Wireless Network Adapter (b g n ), 2.1 Bluetooth
:: Optical drive
HL-DT-ST BDDVDRW CT21N
:: Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 57 x 415 x 320
:: Weight
4.01 kg Power Supply: 0.88 kg
:: Battery
75 Wh Lithium-Ion, 5200 mAh, 8 Cells
:: Price
1800 Euro
:: Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit
:: Additional features
Webcam: 2.0 Megapixel, 150 Watt Power Supply, 24 Months Warranty

 

About 50% of the photos are taken from the previous G73 Reviews.
About 50% of the photos are taken from the previous G73 Reviews.
There are also function buttons for case lighting, ExpressGate & Twin-Turbo as well as Splendid.
There are also function buttons for case lighting, ExpressGate & Twin-Turbo as well as Splendid.
The G73 belongs to the "Republic of Gamers" or "R.O.G." series.
The G73 belongs to the "Republic of Gamers" or "R.O.G." series.
Our pre-release model was not finalized in terms of hardware or software.
Our pre-release model was not finalized in terms of hardware or software.
The keyboard's white backlight can be activated by row.
The keyboard's white backlight can be activated by row.
The comfortable touchpad has generous dimensions.
The comfortable touchpad has generous dimensions.
A Kensington Lock Slot it hidden at the back.
A Kensington Lock Slot it hidden at the back.
Numerous status-LEDs are mounted on the thin front side of the notebook.
Numerous status-LEDs are mounted on the thin front side of the notebook.
At the back the notebook is a thick 6 cm.
At the back the notebook is a thick 6 cm.
Besides the GeForce GTX 460M a USB 3.0 port has also found its way into the notebook.
Besides the GeForce GTX 460M a USB 3.0 port has also found its way into the notebook.
Only two audio ports isn't much.
Only two sound ports isn't much.
At a price of over 1500 Euro, a Blu-Ray drive had better be included.
At a price of over 1500 Euro, a Blu-Ray drive better be included.
Two fans are responsible for venting the graphics card and processor.
Two fans are responsible for venting the graphics card and processor.
Despite the relatively strong battery (75 Wh) the battery life is quite poor.
Despite the relatively strong battery (75 Wh) the battery life is quite poor.
Not only is the power button lit up when on.
Not only is the power button lit up when on.
The 2.0 megapixel webcam forms the eye of a pyramid.
The 2.0 megapixel webcam forms the eye of a pyramid.
the case is predominantly a matte dark gray.
the case is predominantly a matte dark gray.
The design in unique but definitely a matter of taste.
The design in unique but definitely a matter of taste.
The display lid opens up to a disappointing maximum of 110º.
The display lid opens up to a disappointing maximum of 110º.
The shape may remind you of a Lamborghini sportscar or an American stealth bomber.
The shape may remind you of a Lamborghini sportscar or an American stealth bomber.
The outstanding cooling system is one of the great strengths of the G73.
The outstanding cooling system is one of the great strengths of the G73.
The opening on the bottom is attached by two screws and can be removed easily.
The opening on the bottom is attached by two screws and can be removed easily.
The RAM chips and hard disks can easily be replaced.
The RAM chips and hard disks can easily be replaced.
There's only partial access to the GeForce GTX 460M.
There's only partial access to the GeForce GTX 460M.
The case can contain up to two hard disks.
The case can contain up to two hard disks.
Our test model was equipped with two 500 GB hybrid hard drives.
Our test model was equipped with two 500 GB hybrid hard drives.
A model with 12 GB RAM will not be available on the market.
A model with 12 GB RAM will not be available on the market.
The battery can comfortably be inserted in the back.
The battery can comfortably be inserted in the back.
The sound produced by the built-in speaker system is surprisingly good for a notebook.
The sound produced by the built-in speaker system is surprisingly good for a notebook.
The 150 watt power supply is unusually heavy.
The 150 watt power supply is unusually heavy.

Similar Devices

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

» Review Medion Erazer X6813 Notebook
Core i7 2630QM, 15.6", 3.216 kg
» Review Asus VX7 Lamborghini Notebook
Core i7 2630QM, 15.6", 3.772 kg
» Review MSI GT663R Gaming-Notebook
Core i7 740QM, 15.6", 3.426 kg
» Review Update: Asus G53JW Notebook FullHD TFT
Core i7 740QM, 15.6", 3.93 kg
» Review Medion Erazer X6811 Notebook
Core i7 740QM, 15.6", 3.5 kg

Links

Price Comparison

Pro

+Unique Design
+Matte Case
+Flawless Build
+Insignificant Heat Output
+Contrast-Rich Display
+Large Touchpad
+Backlit Keyboard (white)
+Very High Performance
+Hybrid Hard Disks
+Good Sound
+USB-3.0-Port
 

Cons

-Relatively Few Ports
-Somewhat Spongy Keyboard
-Highly Reflective Display
-Short Battery Life
-Very Heavy

Shortcut

What we like

The matte case exterior is delightfully dirt-resistant.

What we'd like to see

Very little. The option of a matte display would be nice, but it's probably wishful thinking for a gaming notebook.

What surprises us

The surprisingly low case temperature and noise production.

The competition

Powerful gaming notebooks like the Deviltech Devil 9700 DTX, the Deviltech Fragbook DTX, the mySN XMG7.c, the MSI GX640, the MSI GX740, the MSI GT660 and the Medion Akoya X7811.

Ratings

Asus G73JW
02/02/2011 v2
Florian Glaser

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
76%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
76%
Weight
56%
Battery
66%
Display
84%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
88%
Noise
76%
Add Points
88%
Average
81%
84%
Gaming *
Weighted Average

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Review Asus G73JW Notebook (GTX 460M)
Author: Florian Glaser, 2010-10- 3 (Update: 2013-09-25)