Huawei P8 lite 2017
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 37 scores (from 52 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P8 lite 2017
Flagship lite 2.0. Huawei's P8 lite was actually the slimmed down version of Huawei's second-last flagship phone. Nevertheless, it has now been reworked with a new design, Full HD panel, and many other improvements. Our report reveals whether the P8 lite (2017) is a good deal.
Source: Toptenreviews Archive.org version
Ultimately, while the P8 Lite is a very capable and affordable smartphone (even more so since we first reviewed it, in the latter case), it’s hard to fully recommend when less flawed alternatives exist. If you want the very best battery life, choose the Lenovo P2; if you want the best all-rounder with the best camera, the Moto G4 is the one for you.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
While Android 7 phones are still in the minority this offering from Huawei has it. Until last year Huawei was a name I had not heard of. A huge launch brought the P9 to the world’s attention and although this was launched much later this is the latest version of the P8.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
The Huawei P8 may be an old phone by today’s standards, but that doesn’t seem to stop Huawei from releasing an updated 2017 Lite variant for consumers. The last Lite variant was released in 2015, around the same time as the flagship P8 was unleashed. Carrying slimmed down hardware and a more affordable price-tag, this cut-down flagship looks to offer mid-tier performance on a budget. It brings an updated design more akin to the Honor 8 that will no doubt appeal to the fashion concious. With the lower tier now incredibly cramped and full of competition, does it have what it takes to stand out? Let’s find out…
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The P8 Lite is a decent mid-range phone. If picking one up on Vodafone for £150, it actually offers superb value. Its attractive built quality and decent battery life make it an excellent choice. However, if you’ve found a handset online from another retailer that’s priced closer to £200, consider the Motorola Moto G4 or Lenovo P2 instead; the Moto G4 has a better camera and the Lenovo P2 superior battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
Huawei P8 Lite 2017 Review: Huawei’s first affordable phone of the year is a revamped version of the P8 Lite, and for just £185 in the UK it’s a seriously strong rival to similar budget blowers. Here’s our full Huawei P8 Lite 2017 review.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 51% display: 82% mobility: 39% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/08/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 89% features: 72% display: 85% mobility: 71%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerbase DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/24/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 75% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit - 3/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Newesc ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 77% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High autonomy; nice design; good price. Negative: Weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Geek 4 You IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Ridble IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2017
Rating: price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% performance: 75% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Megapk IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 91% features: 82%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 86% features: 77% display: 86% mobility: 84% ergonomy: 83%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 80% display: 78% mobility: 85% workmanship: 82%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good price; long battery life. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Tech Different IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High autonomy; nice performance; fast fingerprint reader. Negative: Unsupport fast charge; only 16GB Rom.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice display; decent hardware; good cameras; long battery life. Negative: Unsupport quick charge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design. Negative: Short battery life; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design. Negative: Poor display; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design. Negative: Low autonomy; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design. Negative: Poor display; low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Pleasant design; beautiful screen. Negative: Internal memory too low.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; flexible fingerprint sensor; high performance. Negative: Low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good price; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/08/2017
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2: Integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets with two clusters (MP2) supporting OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 655: ARM-based octa-core-SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A83 cores with 4x max 1.7 power saving cores and 4x max 2.1 GHz performance cores).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. is a Chinese telecommunications company and hardware manufacturer founded in 1987 and headquartered in Shenzhen. Huawei is a global leader in information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. Huawei provides end-to-end solutions for telecommunications networks, devices, and smartphones, as well as storage, servers, networking, and cloud computing enterprise solutions and products.
In 2014, Huawei established the Honor subsidiary brand under which certain smartphone lines are sold. The Huawei name is usually not listed for these products.
78.84%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.