The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.36 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz). The slightly older Kirin 658 is very similar. The 659 is in our benchmarks around 4% faster than the 658 and offers a better LTE radio (Cat. 13).
Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at >=900 MHz), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.
The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a SoC for smartphones and tablets of the entry level. It was first announced in mid 2019 and integrates four CPU cores (quad core). One big Cortex-A75 core clocked at up to 2 GHz and three small A55 cores with up to 1.8 GHz.
Furthermore, the chip integrates an LTE modem (Cat 7, TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), Bluetooth 5.0 and WiFi b/g/n/ac. The integrated ISP supports up to two cameras (16 MPixel and 8 Mpixel, maximum 30 fps video capture) and the GNSS can use all current standards (GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo).
The memory controller is able to drive LPDDR3 at 933 MHz and faster LPDDR4x at 1333 MHz.
The PowerVR GE8300 iGPU is from Imagination and clocked at up to 800 MHz.
The chip is produced in 12nm at TSMC and should offer a rather good power efficiency (for 2019).
Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 100%n=2
Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 659 → 800%n=2
Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 79%n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.27
log 17. 08:32:49
#0 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9252 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.141s ... 0.142s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.142s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.003s ... 0.145s
#8 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.016s ... 0.161s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9252 +0.003s ... 0.164s
#10 got single benchmarks 9252 +0.022s ... 0.185s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.003s ... 0.188s
#12 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.008s ... 0.196s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.196s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.216s ... 0.412s