Notebookcheck Logo

Laptop, Smartphone, and Tablet Comparison

On this page you are able to compare test data and specifications from our reviews. Select a model using our search, the search box below or the compare link in our reviews (below the specs).

Model:

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F Laptop Review: Look Like an Ultrabook, Play Like a Gamer by Allen Ngo
#454 Intel Core i7-8565U
#218 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
16384 MB
1024 GB
unknown: 6
15.60-inch
1920x1080
1650 g
354 x 220 x 18.9
71 Wh
1400 Euro

Specifications

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (ZenBook 15 UX534 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz (Intel Core i7)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1020 MHz, Memory: 1751 MHz, GDDR5, 436.30, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, 1200 MHz, 16-20-20-45
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, BOE07D8, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader
Networking
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.9 x 354 x 220 ( = 0.74 x 13.94 x 8.66 in)
Battery
71 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, My Asus, ICEPower, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.65 kg ( = 58.2 oz / 3.64 pounds), Power Supply: 418 g ( = 14.74 oz / 0.92 pounds)
Price
1400 USD
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

 

291.7
cd/m²		306.4
cd/m²		303.4
cd/m²
276.1
cd/m²		312.6
cd/m²		286.7
cd/m²
266.3
cd/m²		298.4
cd/m²		271.2
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NV156FHM-N63 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 312.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 290.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 312.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1008:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.78
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
ERROR no Specs ID specified in element or header and also no heat ID found in element

Noise Level

Idle
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Load
33.9 / 40.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 9.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5 / 13.2 / 24 Watt
Load midlight 70 / 114 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 29min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 54min

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 - 09/29/2019 v7
Redaktion

Chassis
78 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
82%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
53 / 80 → 67%
Weight
67 / 20-72 → 91%
Battery
82 / 95 → 86%
Display
78%
Games Performance
73 / 90 → 81%
Application Performance
88 / 90 → 98%
Temperature
85%
Noise
95 / 95 → 100%
Audio
76%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Average
76%
83%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pros

+impressive gaming performance for the size and weight
+ScreenPad 2.0 for additional screen real estate
+strong performance on battery power
+small footprint; portable
+rigid base and lid
+long battery life
 

Cons

-warmer core temperatures than other Core U-series laptops
-inserted SD cards protrude by over half their length
-cramped Arrow keys and NumPad keys
-no Thunderbolt 3 or fingerprint reader
-single M.2 2280 storage solution only
-cannot recharge via USB Type-C
-non-upgradeable RAM or WLAN
-ScreenPad is still quite grainy
-DPC latency issues
AS SSD Copy Game MB/s: 1287 MB/s
AS SSD Copy Program MB/s: 468 MB/s
AS SSD Copy ISO MB/s: 1375 MB/s
AS SSD Score Total: 3483 Points
AS SSD Score Write: 1664 Points
AS SSD Score Read: 1210 Points
AS SSD Access Time Write: 0.075 ms*
AS SSD Access Time Read: 0.034 ms*
AS SSD 4K-64 Write: 1375 MB/s
AS SSD 4K-64 Read: 969 MB/s
AS SSD 4K Write: 146 MB/s
AS SSD 4K Read: 52.3 MB/s
AS SSD Seq Write: 1432 MB/s
AS SSD Seq Read: 1887 MB/s
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit: 181 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit: 683 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit: 99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 107.1 fps
3DMark 11 Performance Combined: 8563 Points
3DMark 11 Performance Physics: 9092 Points
3DMark 11 Performance GPU: 10761 Points
3DMark 11 Performance: 10217 Points
3DMark Time Spy CPU: 3810 Points
3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 2836 Points
3DMark Time Spy Score: 2949 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra Combined: 868 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra Physics: 10566 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra Graphics: 1457 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra Score: 1552 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Combined: 2760 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Physics: 10504 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 7593 Points
3DMark Fire Strike Score: 6698 Points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Physics: 7470 Points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Graphics: 46686 Points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 21547 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Total: 1073 ms*
Octane V2 Total Score: 35259 Points
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Write 4K: 141.6 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Read 4K: 45.28 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Write Seq: 1975 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Read Seq: 2272 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Write 4K Q32T1: 458.6 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Read 4K Q32T1: 391.4 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2393 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3464 MB/s
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core): 444 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core): 1645 Points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2: 5132 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2: 3764 Points
JetStream 1.1 Total Score: 246.8 Points
PCMark 10 Digital Content Creation: 4680 Points
PCMark 10 Productivity: 7201 Points
PCMark 10 Essentials: 9067 Points
PCMark 10 Score: 4828 Points
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Highest Preset: 34 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider High Preset: 39 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Medium Preset: 48 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider Lowest Preset: 92 fps
BioShock Infinite Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF): 72 fps
BioShock Infinite High Preset: 172.2 fps
BioShock Infinite Medium Preset: 196.1 fps
BioShock Infinite Very Low Preset: 259.1 fps
The Witcher 3 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+): 30.7 fps
The Witcher 3 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off): 54.3 fps
The Witcher 3 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing: 93.6 fps
The Witcher 3 Low Graphics & Postprocessing: 156.1 fps
Rocket League High Quality: 97.8 fps
Rocket League Quality: 138.1 fps
Rocket League Performance: 193.4 fps
Rocket League Performance: 216.1 fps
SD Card Reader JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs): 69.2 MB/s
SD Card Reader AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB): 82.2 MB/s
Battery Runtime WiFi Websurfing: 503 min
Response Times Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80%: 41.2 ms*
Response Times Response Time Black / White: 33.2 ms*
Response Times PWM Frequency: 0 Hz
Emissions Fan Noise The Witcher 3 ultra: 39.8 dB(A)
Loudspeakers Pink Noise: 77.5 dB(A)
Networking iperf3 receive AX12: 696 MBit/s
Networking iperf3 transmit AX12: 621 MBit/s
Power Consumption Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency: 0.485 fps per Watt
Power Consumption Witcher 3 ultra: 63.3 Watt*
Display Display P3 Coverage: 66.6 %
Display sRGB Coverage: 87.7 %
Display AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage: 64.1 %
* Smaller values are better.
Console
log 02. 19:30:29

#0 before search +0s ... 0s

#1 after search +0s ... 0s

#2 added compareJS +0s ... 0s

#3 looking up spec 311899 +0s ... 0s

#4 more than one entry found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 ZenBook 15 UX534FT for array +0.242s ... 0.244s

#6 return log +0s ... 0.244s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations >
Redaktion, 2014-09-29 (Update: 2014-09-29)