Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Wiko Fever
Source: Android Mag DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/30/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: InstaNews IT→EN
Positive: Compact size; decent hardware; good cameras; long battery life; good price. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
CommentARM Mali-T720 MP4: Integrated graphics card with four clusters clocked at up to 600 MHz. The chip supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and is typically produced in 28nm. These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6753: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
72.5%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.