Ulefone Gemini Pro
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Average of 1 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Ulefone Gemini Pro
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2017
Source: Android User DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2017
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN
Positive: Nice design; flexible fingerprint scanner; decent hardware; good cameras. Negative: Low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→EN
Positive: Good price; large screen; nice display; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2017
Source: Pplware PT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→EN
Positive: Elegant design; fast fingerprint sensor; decent hardware; good cameras. Negative: Short battery life; high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/29/2017
CommentARM Mali-T880 MP12: Mobile graphics solution for tablets and smartphones, which can be found in ARM SoCs like the Samsung Exynos 8890 with 650 MHz. Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Shenzhen ulefone Technology Co., Ltd. is a smaller Chinese smartphone manufacturer. There are currently no reviews on Ulephone smartphones. The first tests have been registered starting with late 2015. The ratings are slightly below average (as of 2016).
78%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.