Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium U5400 vs Intel Pentium P6000

Intel Pentium U5400

► remove from comparison Intel U5400

The Intel Pentium U5400 is an entry level CPU for thin and light laptops. It is based on the Arrandale core (Core i3/i5) but Turbo Boost (for the CPU), Hyper-Threading, Virtualization, Trusted Execution, and AES functions are disabled. Due to the slow clock speed, the U5400 is only sufficient for non demanding applications.

The Arrandale Pentium CPU features the integrated Intel HD Graphics graphics card which is clocked at 166-500 MHz (due to Turbo Boost). Furthermore, the CPU also features an integrated memory controller that supports up to 8 GB of DDR3-800 main memory.

Intel Pentium P6000

► remove from comparison Intel P6000

The Intel Pentium P6000 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 1.68 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Pentium series had).

Compared to the Celeron P4500, the P6000 offers a bit better performance due to the faster System Bus and an increased Level 3 cache. However, VT-x is not available for the P6000.

The P6000 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 766MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is relatively low, because of the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller.

ModelIntel Pentium U5400Intel Pentium P6000
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Pentium Arrandale
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P6200 compare2.13 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P60001.86 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 23 MB
» Intel Pentium U54001.2 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P6200 compare2.13 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 23 MB
» Intel Pentium P60001.86 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 23 MB
Intel Pentium U54001.2 GHz2 / 23 MB
Clock1200 MHz1860 MHz
FSB25004800
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1288PGA988
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Pentium U5400Intel Pentium P6000
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.8 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1229     avg: 1286     median: 1285.5 (11%)     max: 1342 Points
min: 2046     avg: 2051     median: 2050.5 (18%)     max: 2055 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2593     avg: 2599     median: 2599 (4%)     max: 2605 Points
min: 3900     avg: 3940     median: 3939.5 (5%)     max: 3979 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
3246 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1691 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1772     avg: 1791     median: 1790.5 (21%)     max: 1809 s
min: 1130     avg: 1138     median: 1138 (13%)     max: 1146 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 55.3     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (11%)     max: 56.2 s
min: 35.7     avg: 36.1     median: 36.1 (7%)     max: 36.5 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1124     avg: 1126     median: 1126 (2%)     max: 1128 Points
min: 1625     avg: 1635     median: 1638 (3%)     max: 1642 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (8%)     max: 36 s
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (5%)     max: 23.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84.1 s (4%)
min: 54     avg: 54.2     median: 54.2 (2%)     max: 54.4 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1856 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
11000 MIPS (5%)
min: 15150     avg: 16135     median: 16135 (8%)     max: 17120 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7660 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 10740     avg: 11370     median: 11370 (9%)     max: 12000 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
2641 Points (17%)
min: 3929     avg: 4640     median: 4639.5 (29%)     max: 5350 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.9 Points (50%)
5.4 Points (69%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium U5400 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium P6000 → 136% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:58:30

#0 checking url part for id 993 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1096 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 993 +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 got single benchmarks 993 +0.01s ... 0.019s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 1096 +0s ... 0.019s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#19 got single benchmarks 1096 +0.009s ... 0.029s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.03s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.038s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#70 return log +0.004s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)