The best smartphones for Q2 2020 - 39 mobile phones in review

Smartphone Editors' Choice Awards Q2 2020. A total of 39 smartphones were comprehensively tested and reviewed by us in the second quarter of 2020. Which devices stood out in particular? In the following mobile phone comparison you will find the recommendations of our editorial staff as well as current deals.

Editorial staff (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 08/01/2020 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

Despite the disruptions caused by the coronavirus in the months from April to June 2020, smartphone manufacturers were by no means idle and presented numerous new mobile phone models; we took a close look at these for you.

Even if some launches were delayed or could only take place online, our reviewers still had a lot to do; ranging from the budget entry-level smartphone to the expensive flip phone, there were novelties in all categories.

Fresh wind from China with initial difficulties

With Oppo and realme, two brands from China mixed up the mid-range and upper-class markets thanks to the official distribution in Europe. We liked the realme X50 Pro the most thanks to its good battery life, plenty of storage, and high performance level. However, it's not a real price breaker, and the manufacturer should reconsider its pricing policy in the West in view of the strong competition.

With the Find X2 Neo, Oppo also brought a mid-range device onto the market that's not quite budget-friendly. Moreover, it's difficult to keep track of the current jumble of Find X and Reno models from the manufacturer, since they are partly the same smartphone with a different name.

The new manufacturers will probably have to keep smoothing out their strategy a bit, but it's always good to get new impulses for the market.

...or Reno 3 Pro? Naming confusion with Oppo.

The best of the best - These smartphones received the best overall scores

A total of five devices were able to achieve the highest rating of "very good" in our demanding tests and thus also receive the Top-Rated Award.

We rated the Huawei P40 Pro with 89%. In recent years, Huawei's top smartphones have been able to convince us thanks to great cameras and high-quality features. This year, the P40 Pro delivers top performance in the test again, but it's still not for everyone.

Why? The US prohibits its companies from giving the Chinese manufacturer access to American technologies, so the smartphone comes with the open-source Android operating system but without Google Apps and services.

Even though Huawei is doing a lot to build its own ecosystem, the user experience is still very limited at the moment. Hardcore fans who like to tinker with their devices will currently find big discounts and can take a look therefore.

Just behind the Huawei P40 Pro, and usable without restrictions, is the most expensive device so far of the Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi: The Mi 10 Pro. It says goodbye to the price-breaker image that the manufacturer had maintained until that moment, but in return, it offers great specs like a high-quality OLED display, first-class workmanship, and very good cameras, even if the wide-angle camera still lags a bit behind other brands.

The OnePlus 8 Pro also received a "very good" in our test. This manufacturer once had the image of a "flagship killer" too, putting pressure on the established manufacturers with cheap devices.

However, OnePlus itself is a well-known player in the premium market nowadays, and thus, the prices have gone up again with the OnePlus 8 Pro and have almost reached the 1,000-Euro mark (~$1,184). But there's also a lot being offered in exchange: very fast charging, a bright and precisely calibrated display, a fancy and stable case, flexible cameras, fast storage, and for the first time with OnePlus, even an IP certification. By the way: With the OnePlus Nord, the manufacturer wants to make the fans of cheaper smartphones happy again soon.

The cheaper and minimally watered-down versions of the aforementioned smartphones, the Xiaomi Mi 10 and the OnePlus 8, also get our best rating. Both are hardly inferior to their bigger siblings in terms of performance, and you don't have to do without 5G either.

In regard to cameras, the OnePlus 8 appeals to us more; it also offers significantly longer battery life. Both smartphones are of high-quality workmanship and also offer a bright screen. It's the details that make the difference; you can read the partial results that are most important to you personally in detail in our reviews.

Our favorite - Editors' Choice Awards Q2 2020

Based on the review results obtained in the period under consideration, we conduct an editorial vote and then present the Editors' Choice Award. The award will be given to those smartphones that stand out through their successful overall package, absolute top performance in specific rating areas or a particularly good price-performance ratio and that represent an attractive purchase option for our editors in the respective category.

Apple iPhone SE 2020

The new iPhone SE 2020 surprised at its presentation with the fact that it contains the same SoC as Apple's current flagship devices. For just under 530 Euros (~$628), you get a decent amount of power in an iPhone 8 outfit. In the test, we also liked the bright IPS display as well as the fast Wi-Fi 6 and the many LTE frequencies supported. The iPhone SE 2020 presents itself as a modern device due to the inclusion of wireless charging as well through its light and slim case.

However, you shouldn't be a fan of 5G because the budget iPhone doesn't support this. There's also only a single camera, moderate call quality, and just 12 months of warranty. The design is also no longer quite up to date with its wide bezels above and below the screen and the large Home button.

But you have to accept some compromises if you want to enter the Apple world for little money. For less-demanding users, the iPhone SE 2020 is a great device, very mature, and with lots of power.

Note: Commercial use of the award graphics may require a license. More details.

The following table shows all smartphones tested in the period under consideration with their overall and partial ratings in our detailed review as well as a selection of important parameters and benchmarks. All results and details can be found in the linked review articles. The table can be sorted in each column; just click on the respective column title, for example, on "Weight". In addition, the table can be filtered; the input is done via the "Search" field. Example: "120 Hz" or "AMOLED".

The best smartphones - Reviewed in Q2 2020

Overall score	Model	Chassis score	Size	Width	Weight score	Weight	Display score	Display type	Resolution	Pixel density	Screen-to-body ratio	Display brightness	Delta E Colorchecker	Refresh rate	Camera score	Delta E Colorchecker low light	Delta E Colorchecker daylight	Application performance score	PCMark for Android Work 2.0 score	Gaming performance score	3DMark for A. Sling Shot Ext. (ES 3.1) Un.	GFXBench Aztec Ruins H.T. Onscreen	PUBG Mobile HD	Battery life score	Battery life Wi-Fi 150 cd/m²	Temperature score	Top idle	Top load	Audio score	max. audio output (dB)	Touchscreen input score	Connectivity score
89.4 %	Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	93.1 %	6.58"	8.95 mm	87.9 %	209 g	92.3 %	OLED	2640x1200	441 PPI	19.8:9	576 cd/m²	1.1	090 Hz	82.8 %	11.63	10.6	82.2 %	11341	57.7 %	6508	23	40	90.2 %	743 min	94.5 %	28.3 °C	30.2 °C	72.4 %	89.1 dB	95 %	68.8 %
85.8 %	Google Pixel 4 XL SD 855, Adreno 640	87.9 %	6.30"	8.2 mm	88.6 %	193 g	89.3 %	P-OLED	3040x1440	534 PPI	19:9	555 cd/m²	3.9	090 Hz	67.4 %	40.71	7.26	78.7 %	10335	55.2 %	6404	11		88.4 %	623 min	92.2 %	29.2 °C	36.4 °C	75.4 %	84.3 dB	97.2 %	50.9 %
87.4 %	Huawei P40 Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	89.6 %	6.10"	8.5 mm	90.1 %	175 g	90.7 %	AMOLED	2340x1080	422 PPI	19.5:9	593 cd/m²	3.03	060 Hz	77.4 %	6.19	8.74	76.2 %	8736	53.9 %	6140	27	30	90.1 %	806 min	88.2 %	31.5 °C	39.9 °C	72 %	79.6 dB	95 %	58 %
81.3 %	Huawei P40 Lite Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6	82.3 %	6.40"	8.7 mm	89.5 %	183 g	86.2 %	IPS	2310x1080	398 PPI	19.2:9	448 cd/m²	3	060 Hz	59.8 %	45.98	8.6	73.7 %	9164	31.5 %	2954	13	30	91.3 %	1007 min	92.1 %	34.1 °C	35.4 °C	71.6 %	88.2 dB	91.1 %	46.6 %
88.2 %	Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	88.4 %	6.67"	8.96 mm	87.9 %	208 g	92.9 %	Super AMOLED	2340x1080	386 PPI	19.5:9	762 cd/m²	0.9	090 Hz	76.2 %	22.31	9.63	82.3 %	10952	60.8 %	7986	30	40	90.1 %	865 min	93.4 %	30.4 °C	33.1 °C	78.2 %	84.5 dB	96.1 %	54.4 %
88.5 %	OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	91.3 %	6.78"	8.5 mm	88.1 %	199 g	94.2 %	AMOLED	3168x1440	513 PPI	19.8:9	779 cd/m²	0.68	120 Hz	78 %	8.01	11.2	82.6 %	11153	61.1 %	8111	31	39	90.5 %	923 min	81.9 %	33.1 °C	46.7 °C	76 %	84.4 dB	97.2 %	53.2 %
77.5 %	Umidigi Power 3 Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3	76.9 %	6.53"	10.3 mm	87.7 %	218 g	81.3 %	IPS	2340x1080	395 PPI	19.5:9	450 cd/m²	7.13	060 Hz	64.2 %	16.74	6.39	70.5 %	7954	15.1 %	1266	4.6		92.2 %	1124 min	86.6 %	30.3 °C	42.7 °C	40.6 %	75.8 dB	93.3 %	44.6 %
78.1 %	Umidigi F2 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	76 %	6.53"	8.7 mm	87.8 %	215 g	81.7 %	IPS	2340x1080	395 PPI	19.5:9	512 cd/m²	6.53	060 Hz	64 %	19.71	6.33	73.1 %	7905	15.2 %	1303	5.1		91.9 %	1078 min	86.8 %	29.3 °C	42.5 °C	66 %	81.4 dB	91.7 %	42.3 %
82.6 %	Huawei Mate Xs Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16	65.6 %	8.00"	11 mm	86.4 %	300 g	88.7 %	OLED	2480x2200	414 PPI	10.15:9	418 cd/m²	2.6	060 Hz	79 %	10.01	7.03	77.4 %	8512	47.1 %	4422	46	40	84.2 %	481 min	92.2 %	33.8 °C	33.8 °C	72 %	81.9 dB	89.4 %	64.8 %
84.1 %	Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620	85.7 %	6.50"	7.7 mm	90.5 %	171 g	86.9 %	AMOLED	2400x1080	405 PPI	20:9	778 cd/m²	5.28	090 Hz	69.6 %	32.3	10.27	77.4 %	7896	38 %	3415	13		90.3 %	876 min	91.3 %	28.2 °C	37.8 °C	76 %	83.5 dB	95.4 %	46 %
74.8 %	Motorola Moto E6s Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	76.4 %	6.10"	8.5 mm	91.4 %	160 g	84.7 %	IPS	1560x720	282 PPI	20:9	481 cd/m²	5.02	060 Hz	40.4 %	44.34	9.99	54.1 %	5197	6.2 %	523	4.2		89.8 %	806 min	93 %	28.1 °C	33.9 °C	69.4 %	82.3 dB	92.2 %	32.9 %
79.7 %	Honor 9X Pro Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6	80.7 %	6.59"	8.8 mm	87.9 %	206 g	82.9 %	IPS	2340x1080	391 PPI	19.5:9	474 cd/m²	6.3	060 Hz	59.2 %	17.88	5.33	70.2 %	7541	28.5 %	2515	11	30	91 %	971 min	93.2 %	32.5 °C	32.9 °C	75.8 %	82.7 dB	88.9 %	47.7 %
76.6 %	Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610	79.1 %	6.40"	9 mm	89 %	188 g	86.2 %	IPS	1560x720	268 PPI	19.5:9	452 cd/m²	3.84	060 Hz	53.3 %	42.34	10.05	56.2 %	6969	13.1 %	1138	9.1		90.8 %	988 min	88.1 %	30.7 °C	41.2 °C	67.4 %	80.1 dB	90.6 %	37.3 %
68.3 %	Nokia 1.3 SD 215, Adreno 308	59.9 %	5.71"	9.35 mm	91.9 %	155 g	82 %	IPS	1520x720	295 PPI	19.5:9	406 cd/m²	5.22	060 Hz	34.4 %	47.72	4.84	31.1 %	3476	3.8 %				90.6 %	906 min	84.6 %	36.5 °C	44.5 °C	50 %	78.8 dB	77.8 %	33.1 %
85.2 %	Apple iPhone SE 2020 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	81.9 %	4.70"	7.3 mm	92.5 %	148 g	90.4 %	IPS	1334x750	326 PPI	16:9	659 cd/m²	1	060 Hz	63 %	33.05	10.45	83 %		59.9 %	5688	60	60	88.6 %	694 min	88 %	36 °C	40.5 °C	71.4 %	86.4 dB	89.4 %	50.7 %
76.7 %	Huawei P smart Pro Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	80.3 %	6.59"	8.8 mm	87.9 %	206 g	82 %	TFT-LCD (LTPS)	2340x1080	391 PPI	19.5:9	459 cd/m²	5.7	060 Hz	60 %	20.65	5.19	62 %	6993	12.4 %	991	2.3		89.4 %	757 min	88.4 %	36.2 °C	39.4 °C	79 %	86 dB	87.2 %	37.7 %
80.7 %	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	81.9 %	6.67"	8.8 mm	87.9 %	209 g	85.1 %	IPS	2400x1080	395 PPI	20:9	612 cd/m²	3.98	060 Hz	59.4 %	46.88	7.3	68.5 %	7673	29.3 %	2680	11	30	92.3 %	1187 min	88.3 %	34.7 °C	39.9 °C	72 %	81 dB	95.6 %	44.3 %
87.8 %	Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650	88 %	6.67"	8.96 mm	87.9 %	208 g	92.7 %	Super AMOLED	2340x1080	386 PPI	19.5:9	791 cd/m²	1.1	090 Hz	73.2 %	17.14	9.65	82.1 %	10613	62.3 %	7957	29	60	89.8 %	662 min	90.2 %	31.3 °C	39.3 °C	77.4 %	83.5 dB	96.1 %	54 %
79.8 %	Oppo A91 Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	86.7 %	6.40"	7.9 mm	90.4 %	172 g	84.7 %	AMOLED	2400x1080	411 PPI	20:9	613 cd/m²	6.1	060 Hz	66.8 %	41.38	5.39	74.1 %	8185	15.5 %	1265	4.5		88.3 %	605 min	91.5 %	32.7 °C	35.2 °C	75.6 %	88.9 dB	86.1 %	47 %
74.9 %	Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320	83.6 %	6.50"	9.2 mm	88 %	200 g	81.5 %	IPS	1600x720	270 PPI	20:9	462 cd/m²	5.7	060 Hz	48 %	44.89	5.76	55.6 %	5325	7.1 %	539	4.2		90 %	833 min	89.9 %	34.6 °C	37.4 °C	75 %	85 dB	86.1 %	39.3 %
81 %	Motorola Edge SD 765, Adreno 620	85.6 %	6.70"	9.3 mm	88.9 %	190 g	86.4 %	AMOLED	2340x1080	385 PPI	19.5:9	438 cd/m²	5.34	090 Hz	61 %	36.89	6.57	73 %	8336	33.1 %	3223	12	30	90.9 %	888 min	86.3 %	33.7 °C	41.7 °C	68.6 %	80.5 dB	88.3 %	49.3 %
76.6 %	Huawei P Smart 2020 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	76.9 %	6.21"	8.2 mm	91.2 %	163 g	83 %	IPS	2340x1080	415 PPI	19.5:9	448 cd/m²	5.22	060 Hz	54.6 %	46.61	5.59	56.2 %		30 %	967		30	79.3 %	523 min	86.2 %	28.7 °C	44.3 °C	60 %	74.8 dB	93.9 %	41.8 %
76.9 %	Realme C3 Helio G70, Mali-G52 MP2	79.6 %	6.50"	8.95 mm	88.4 %	195 g	82.8 %	IPS	1600x720	270 PPI	20:9	492 cd/m²	6.1	060 Hz	56 %	43.97	6.58	62.5 %	8838	13.5 %	1216	9.6	30	94.1 %	1371 min	91.4 %	30.5 °C	37.6 °C	70.6 %	88.9 dB	84.4 %	40 %
78.2 %	Realme 6i Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2	79.7 %	6.50"	9 mm	88.1 %	199 g	83.3 %	IPS	1600x720	270 PPI	20:9	484 cd/m²	5.8	060 Hz	64.2 %	38.49	6.89	63.4 %	8733	15.1 %	1347	11	30	93.7 %	1318 min	93 %	30.4 °C	34.3 °C	79.6 %	86.4 dB	84.4 %	38.5 %
80.7 %	Realme 6 Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4	83.4 %	6.50"	8.9 mm	88.8 %	191 g	85.2 %	IPS	2400x1080	405 PPI	20:9	427 cd/m²	4.4	090 Hz	67.6 %	38.39	5.32	69.5 %	10512	28.9 %	2568	11	30	91 %	971 min	90.2 %	29.9 °C	39.6 °C	74.2 %	87.4 dB	86.1 %	47.4 %
85.3 %	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	84.9 %	7.10"	10.1 mm	87.6 %	253 g	85.1 %	AMOLED	3120x1440	484 PPI	19.5:9	589 cd/m²	4.65	090 Hz	71.2 %	40.48	10.49	83.2 %	10945	59 %		27	60	89.7 %	767 min	89.5 %	27.9 °C	40.2 °C	69.4 %	84.3 dB	93.9 %	51.3 %
84.2 %	Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650	84.3 %	6.65"	9.75 mm	87.7 %	218 g	83.4 %	OLED	2340x1080	388 PPI	19.5:9	601 cd/m²	8.1	144 Hz	61.2 %	39.79	7.86	83.1 %	12879	60.8 %	8154	28	60	88.3 %	614 min	90 %	31 °C	40 °C	76.4 %	83.4 dB	95.6 %	51.6 %
76.1 %	Motorola Razr 2019 SD 710, Adreno 616	73.3 %	6.20"	6.9 mm	87.9 %	205 g	84.9 %	P-OLED	2142x876	373 PPI	22:9	428 cd/m²	6.39	060 Hz	54.8 %	43.06	8.56	63.7 %	7460	21.9 %	2006	11	30	80.7 %	469 min	88.7 %	30.6 °C	43.5 °C	66 %	80.6 dB	94.4 %	44.4 %
84 %	Oppo Reno3 Pro SD 765G, Adreno 620	85.7 %	6.50"	7.7 mm	90.5 %	171 g	86.6 %	AMOLED	2400x1080	405 PPI	20.9	574 cd/m²	4.84	090 Hz	70.2 %	32.31	5.3	79.5 %	8573	38.7 %	3497	13		90.5 %	893 min	86.8 %	29.6 °C	43.6 °C	75.2 %	85.1 dB	95 %	44.8 %
80.1 %	Oppo Reno3 Helio P90, PowerVR GM9446	78.3 %	6.40"	7.9 mm	90.6 %	170 g	86.6 %	AMOLED	2400x1080	411 PPI	20:9	598 cd/m²	4.96	060 Hz	69.6 %	39.77	7.26	69.4 %	7129	16.6 %	1287	5.8		89.8 %	802 min	86.3 %	29.5 °C	45.3 °C	77.4 %	82.5 dB	90 %	45.5 %
86.1 %	Realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	85.7 %	6.44"	8.9 mm	87.9 %	205 g	88.8 %	OLED	2400x1080	409 PPI	20:9	690 cd/m²	3.2	090 Hz	67 %	37.51	11.42	83.8 %	13202	61.3 %	8204	30	60	90 %	775 min	94.1 %	29 °C	31.8 °C	76.2 %	87.7 dB	93.3 %	52.7 %
74.6 %	Alcatel 1S (2020) Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320	75.1 %	6.22"	8.45 mm	91 %	165 g	81.4 %	IPS	1520x720	270 PPI	19:9	456 cd/m²	6.7	060 Hz	47.2 %	46.66	8.87	51.1 %	4817	6.5 %	458	4.4		93 %	1226 min	95 %	26.6 °C	31.4 °C	70.4 %	80.8 dB	83.9 %	37.8 %
79.6 %	Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	83.8 %	6.60"	8.9 mm	88.4 %	195 g	83.8 %	IPS	2400x1080	399 PPI	20:9	419 cd/m²	6.1	090 Hz	63.2 %	37.07	8.27	72.9 %	10106	28.6 %	2656	11		91.5 %	1031 min	93 %	31.2 °C	33.6 °C	73.6 %	82 dB	80 %	48.3 %
88.4 %	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	88.7 %	6.55"	8 mm	89.7 %	180 g	93 %	AMOLED	2400x1080	402 PPI	20:9	783 cd/m²	0.9	090 Hz	73.6 %	21.53	9.14	81.5 %	10800	60.9 %	8153	31	60	91.2 %	1045 min	93.9 %	29.2 °C	32 °C	72.8 %	89.4 dB	97.2 %	51.7 %
78.8 %	Samsung Galaxy A41 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2	83.9 %	6.10"	7.9 mm	92.1 %	152 g	89.8 %	Super AMOLED	2400x1080	431 PPI	20:9	559 cd/m²	2	060 Hz	62.2 %	43.89	7.96	56.9 %	6742	13.4 %	1179	4.9	28	89.4 %	650 min	92.5 %	26.2 °C	36.6 °C	68.2 %	85.5 dB	84.4 %	47.5 %
83.5 %	Oppo Find X2 Neo SD 765G, Adreno 620	85.7 %	6.50"	7.7 mm	90.5 %	171 g	86.8 %	OLED	2400x1080	405 PPI	20:9	807 cd/m²	5.4	090 Hz	67 %	40.29	8.14	76.3 %	8456	35.9 %	3501	13		89.1 %	712 min	91.1 %	29.2 °C	37.6 °C	79.8 %	86.3 dB	93.3 %	49.7 %
82.3 %	Oppo Find X2 Lite SD 765G, Adreno 620	82 %	6.40"	7.96 mm	89.7 %	180 g	85.9 %	OLED	2400x1080	411 PPI	20:9	633 cd/m²	5.6	060 Hz	68.2 %	41.26	6.61	74.8 %	7754	36 %	3524	13		89.2 %	728 min	90.4 %	28.2 °C	40.1 °C	71 %	91.1 dB	92.2 %	48 %
74.7 %	Wiko View 4 Lite Helio A25, PowerVR GE8320	77.3 %	6.52"	8.45 mm	90.2 %	174 g	83.5 %	IPS	1600x720	269 PPI	20:9	470 cd/m²	4.5	060 Hz	49.6 %	46.67	5.1	52.8 %	5060	6.6 %	462	4.2		92.3 %	1133 min	93.4 %	28.8 °C	34 °C	68 %	83.1 dB	82.8 %	37.1 %
82.9 %	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618	85.5 %	6.67"	8.8 mm	87.9 %	209 g	89.3 %	IPS	2400x1080	395 PPI	20:9	579 cd/m²	1.8	060 Hz	65 %	41.94	5.91	69.5 %	7829	29.2 %	2667	11	30	91.7 %	1175 min	90.8 %	30 °C	38.4 °C	80.2 %	87.1 dB	95.6 %	50.4 %

ZTE Axon 11 Smartphone Review: Cheap even with a 48-MP Quad Camera 08/02/2020

Read all 2 comments / answer

Loading comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: J. Simon Leitner - Founder, COO - 764 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2005

I am one of the founders of Notebookcheck, which I dedicated myself with after my studies at the Vienna Technical University were completed. Computers have been an integral part of my daily activities since the time of the Commodore C64 and Atari 1040ST. Besides new technologies such as electric mobility and environmental technology, I am also interested in architecture and construction engineering.

contact me via: @SimLeitner, Facebook, LinkedIn, Xing

Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

I've been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The best smartphones for Q2 2020 - 39 mobile phones in review

Editorial staff, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 1)