Notebookcheck

The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra fails to surpass the Galaxy S20 Ultra on DxOMark

DxOMark has put the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's cameras through its pace
DxOMark has put the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's cameras through its paces (image via Samsung)
Samsung's shiny new Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has finally made an appearance on DxOMark. It manages to get an overall score of 121 (130/101 for photos/video), putting it one point short of its predecessor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra. DxOMark concludes by saying that the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's cameras can capture high-quality content, but with some caveats.
Anil Satyanarayana,

Samsung has never marketed its Galaxy Note line of phones for its camera prowess. However, it would be rather shameful if a near US$-1,500 smartphone came with underwhelming camera setup. While the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's cameras claim to build upon and correct some of the Galaxy S20 Ultra's faults, its DxOMark score seems to suggest otherwise.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra netted an overall score of 121 (130 for photos and 101 for videos) on DxOMark, one point less than the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which scored 122 (132/100 for photos/video). The Galaxy S20 Ultra was heavily criticized for its autofocus issues. It appears that they persist on the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra even though Samsung used an entirely new sensor on its H2 2020 flagship. Another avenue where Samsung's smartphone cameras have fallen flat is low-light photography, and the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra does little to change that. While some of these issues can be fixed partially via software updates, Samsung needs to go back to the drawing board if it wants to breach DxOMark's top five list, which is currently populated by Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi.

However, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's camera isn't all bad. DxOMark notes that its wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle lenses are one of the best on the market. Its dynamic range and color accuracy are pretty spot-on as well. Older Samsung cameras have been notorious for oversaturating images to make them look prettier. Thankfully, that isn't the case with newer devices.

DxOMark's meticulous testing methodology has experts pore through thousands of images shot in a variety of environments. However, a 'bad' score isn't always indicative of how the smartphone's cameras will perform under lighting conditions outside of the test environments. Unlike synthetic benchmarks that stress mobile SoCs in the same way, camera benchmarks are a lot more complicated. Despite the Galaxy Note Ultra's somewhat 'underwhelming' score, DxOMark concludes by saying that it is still capable of delivering high-quality photos and videos.

Buy Galaxy S20 Ultra now on Amazon

Galaxy Note 20 Ultra DxOMark score (image via DxOMark)
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra DxOMark score (image via DxOMark)
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra DxOMark score (image via DxOMark)
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra DxOMark score (image via DxOMark)

Source(s)

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2020 10 > The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra fails to surpass the Galaxy S20 Ultra on DxOMark
Anil Satyanarayana, 2020-10- 5 (Update: 2020-10- 7)
Anil Satyanarayana
I've been an avid PC gamer since the age of 8. My passion for gaming eventually pushed me towards general tech, and I've been a stereotypical 'nerd' ever since. I have a degree in mechanical engineering and have worked in the manufacturing industry. When I'm not writing news on Notebookcheck, you can find me playing or watching an intense match of DOTA 2