Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7200 (T606) vs Unisoc T7225 (T612)

Unisoc T7200 (T606)

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200 (T606)

The Unisoc T7200 (formerly Unisoc T606) is an entry level octa core SoC with two big ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.6 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.6 GHz. The SoC further includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an LPDDR4X 1600 MHz memory controller, an ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU at 650 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 12nm FinFET process.

Unisoc T7225 (T612)

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7225 (T612)

The Unisoc T7225 (formerly Unisoc T612) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4/4X-1600 memory controller, an ARM Mali G52MP1 GPU at 614 MHz and a tri core ISP (24, 8 and 8 MPixels max). Compared to the Unisoc T610, the T7225 offers one GPU core less (G52 MC1 versus MC2).

The chip is manufactured by TSMC on 12nm FinFET process.

ModelUnisoc T7200 (T606)Unisoc T7225 (T612)
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1600 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (28%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
370 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
1364 Points (6%)
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
2973 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2228     avg: 11490     median: 12397 (10%)     max: 13705 Points
12581 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (14%)     max: 56 Points
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
73 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
155928 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (11%)     max: 238808 Points
196368 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (15%)     max: 82626 Points
68374 Points (17%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 221540     avg: 245262     median: 245367 (8%)     max: 290675 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 79973     avg: 81151     median: 81069 (2%)     max: 82324 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
1218 Points (0%)
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (39%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (12%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (8%)     max: 25251 Points
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (6%)     max: 15127 Points
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (28%)     max: 7776 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7100 Points (46%)
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 (T606) → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7225 (T612) → 111% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 12:26:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1747391182s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 May 2025 05:18:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.021s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.007s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.051s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.051s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)