Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 vs AMD E2-1800

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.

AMD E2-1800

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6570AMD E2-1800
CodenamePenrynZacate
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2100 MHz1700 MHz
FSB800
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt18 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm40 nm
Die Size107 mm275 mm2
SocketPGA478FT1 BGA 413-Ball
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.2 Points (2%)
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (14%)     max: 2314 Points
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (7%)     max: 1128 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (3%)     max: 4284 Points
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2147 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4768 Points (3%)
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (1%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2462 Points (3%)
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (1%)     max: 1226 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1170 s (14%)
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2152 (25%)     max: 2381 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
36.8 s (7%)
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69.1 (14%)     max: 72.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (1%)     max: 505 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-1800 +
18.3 fps (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (2%)     max: 1124 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2384 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (10%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6570 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5 Points (64%)
3.9 Points (50%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (3%)     max: 4040 Points
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (2%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (2%)     max: 740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (8%)     max: 9853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (2%)     max: 942 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (9%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (10%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 55% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 10. 13:25:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3144 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760095558s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 466 +0.006s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3144 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 3144 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.038s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)