Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tiger T310 vs Intel Atom N450

UNISOC Tiger T310

► remove from comparison  T310

The Unisoc Tiger T310 is a SoC for smartphones and tablets of the entry level. It was first announced in mid 2019 and integrates four CPU cores (quad core). One big Cortex-A75 core clocked at up to 2 GHz and three small A55 cores with up to 1.8 GHz.

Furthermore, the chip integrates an LTE modem (Cat 7, TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), Bluetooth 5.0 and WiFi b/g/n/ac. The integrated ISP supports up to two cameras (16 MPixel and 8 Mpixel, maximum 30 fps video capture) and the GNSS can use all current standards (GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo).

The memory controller is able to drive LPDDR3 at 933 MHz and faster LPDDR4x at 1333 MHz.

The PowerVR GE8300 iGPU is from Imagination and clocked at up to 800 MHz.

The chip is produced in 12nm at TSMC and should offer a rather good power efficiency (for 2019).

Intel Atom N450

► remove from comparison Intel N450

The Intel Atom N450 is a small and cheap entry level CPU for Netbooks and small laptops. In the package is an integrated memory controller for DDR2 main memory and the GMA 3150 graphics card. 

The performance of the whole system (Atom N450 and integrated GMA 3150) is only sufficient for basic tasks like surfing the web, or office working. HD video, video cutting, advanced photo editing, multitasking and of course gaming may overstrain the GPU and CPU. Compared to the previous Atom generation, the performance gain is only marginally above a similar clocked Atom N280 / GMA 950. To decode HD videos in 1080p the N450 / GMA3150 needs the help from a additional chip like the the ION2 or Broadcom video decoder.

An advantage of the interation, is the small overall power consumption of the CPU, GPU and memory controller (only 5.5 Watt TDP). Intel states 20% power reduction and 60% package reduction. Therefore, the chip is ideally used in small Netbooks, MIDs, and thin laptops. Compared to the Z500 series combined with the US15W chipset (2.4+2.3 W), the power consumption is similar.

ModelUNISOC Tiger T310Intel Atom N450
Series Intel Atom
Series: Atom Pinetrail
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 « 1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Intel Atom D525 compare1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores
Intel Atom N455 compare1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N450 « 1.66 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom N435 compare1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1660 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 2
12 nm45 nm, 0.8-1.175V
FeaturesLTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHzintegrated DDR2 (667 MHz) memory controller, integrated GMA 3150 GPU, Hyperthreading, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUPowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.comark.intel.com
CodenamePinetrail
FSB533
L2 Cache512 KB
TDP5.5 Watt
Transistors123 Million
Die Size66 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA559
$64 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N450 +
min: 0.23     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.24 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 457     avg: 553     median: 560 (3%)     max: 589 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N450 +
min: 741     avg: 861     median: 865 (1%)     max: 938 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 3252     avg: 3766     median: 3719 (44%)     max: 5166 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N450 +
min: 115.8     avg: 120.7     median: 117 (24%)     max: 161.7 s
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 N450 +
min: 1270     avg: 1349     median: 1340 (3%)     max: 1444 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N450 +
813 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1588 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T310 +
1590 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
376 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
756 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1687 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T310 +
2987 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T310 +
1656 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T310 +
3239 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
11986 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T310 +
45 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T310 +
63 Points (13%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T310 +
162595 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T310 +
57138 Points (16%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T310 +
1653 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T310 +
9900 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T310 +
6866 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T310 +
3.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T310 +
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N450 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 07:30:20

#0 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 539 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.093s ... 0.094s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.094s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.003s ... 0.098s

#7 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.012s ... 0.11s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 539 +0.004s ... 0.113s

#9 got single benchmarks 539 +0.109s ... 0.222s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.222s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.154s ... 0.376s

#12 return log +0.072s ... 0.448s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)