Sharp Aquos Series
Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 305, Qualcomm Adreno 508, Qualcomm Adreno 540, Qualcomm Adreno 630, Qualcomm Adreno 640
Display: 5.00 inch, 5.50 inch, 5.90 inch, 5.99 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.40 inch
Weight: 0.14kg, 0.141kg, 0.165kg, 0.173kg, 0.181kg
Price: 199, 229, 350, 399, 400, 450 euro
Average of 16 scores (from 33 reviews)
Sharp Aquos Crystal
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos CrystalProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 305
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.141kg
Price: 199 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Reviews
A sharp edge. The term "edge-to-edge" has now become a common marketing ploy to advertise most any portable with a display, but Sharp have taken the term one step further. We find out why the Aquos Crystal is the 2015 CES Innovation Awards Honoree with a closer look at its striking and alluring design.
Sharp Aquos S2
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos S2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2040 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 450 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; powerful hardware; good price; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/03/2018
Sharp Aquos S3
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos S3Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508
Display: 6.00 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 400 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; beautiful screen; NFC chip. Negative: No B20 band in 4G LTE; no mini-jack port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/29/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; thin frames; nice display; good cameras; decent hardware; face ID.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/27/2018
Sharp Aquos R2
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos R2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Display: 6.00 inch, 21:10, 3040 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.181kg
Price: 350 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful hardware; good price; metal case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/11/2018
Sharp Aquos C10
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos C10Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508
Display: 5.50 inch, 17:9, 2040 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 399 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
With the Sharp Aquos C10 mid-range smartphone, the manufacturer that is quite successful in Japan also tries to get a foot in the door in the West again as well. Thanks to a good performance and ample screen real estate, the smartphone might be attractive. You can find out in our review whether the comeback is successful.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 79% features: 60% display: 58% mobility: 78%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 79% features: 60% display: 58% mobility: 78%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price. Negative: Short battery life; no headphone jack; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2020
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price. Negative: Short battery life; no headphone jack; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/23/2020
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; excellent display; powerful hardware; nice cameras; NFC chip; good connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2019
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; excellent display; powerful hardware; nice cameras; NFC chip; good connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2019
Sharp Aquos D10
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos D10Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 630
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 508
Display: 5.99 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 400 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 88% performance: 65% display: 82% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 65% display: 82% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Bright.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Negative: No wireless charging; unsupported waterproof; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/29/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 20% workmanship: 65%
Sharp Aquos V
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos VProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Display: 5.90 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.173kg
Price: 229 euro
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
With an older SoC, which was in the fastest mobile phones in the world a few years ago, Sharp wants to shake up the middle class in 2020. The Aquos V also offers a dual camera and fast memory. This raises expectations, which we will check in the review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2020
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price. Negative: Average performance; weak hardware; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2020
Source: Antyweb PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price. Negative: Average performance; weak hardware; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2020
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/12/2019
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/12/2019
Sharp Aquos Zero 2
Specifications
Notebook: Sharp Aquos Zero 2Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 640
Display: 6.40 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.141kg
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Jagat Review ID→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2020
Comment
Sharp:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Qualcomm Adreno 305: Integrated mid-range graphics card in the Snapdragon 400 and S4 Plus SoCs that supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and features unified shaders.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 508: Integrated graphics card in the Snapdragon 630 SoC based on the Adreno 500 architecture. According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs".
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 630: Integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC. According to Qualcomm 30% faster than the old Adreno 540 in the Snapdragon 835 with 30% less power consumption.
Qualcomm Adreno 540: Integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC. Slighly optimized architecture compared to the Adreno 530 but with higher clock speed due to the new 10 nm process. In the beginning of 2017 one of the fastest graphics cards for Android based smartphones.
Qualcomm Adreno 640: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets that is intergrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC. Qualcomm claims that it is 20% faster than the Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 845 SoC and offers 50% more compute units (ALUs).
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
400 MSM8926: ARM Cortex-A7 Quad-Core clocked at up to 1.2 GHz, manufactured in 28nm. Supports LTE.
SD 630: Mid-range octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 cpu cores at up to 2.2 GHz, an Adreno 508 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller and a X12 LTE (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 MBit) modem. Manufactured in the modern 14nm process.
SD 845: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in early 2018 and manufactured in 10 nm LPP FinFET at TSMC. Integrates 4x Kryo 385 cores (Cortex-A75) at up to 2.8 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 385 at 1.8 GHz (max) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X20 LTE modem, ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.
SD 835: High-End SoC for smartphones that was introduced in early 2017 and manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. Integrates 4x Kryo 280 at 2.45 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at 1.9 GHz (max) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.
SD 855: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2018 and manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC. Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a modified ARM Cortex-A76 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are also based on the A76 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a X24 LTE modem (up to 2 Gigbit download), a new Wi-Fi modem (Wi-Fi 6 ready, 60 GHz mmWave), Hexagon 690 DSP with new Tensor cores for AI processing, a Spectra 380 ISP with an integrated computer vision engine and an integrated LPDDR4x memory controller.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00:
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
6.00:
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
69.26%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.