Sharp Aquos V
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Sharp Aquos V
With an older SoC, which was in the fastest mobile phones in the world a few years ago, Sharp wants to shake up the middle class in 2020. The Aquos V also offers a dual camera and fast memory. This raises expectations, which we will check in the review.
Source: Android Pit DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2020
Source: Antyweb PL→EN
Positive: Good price. Negative: Average performance; weak hardware; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2020
Source: Danviet VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; decent processor; decent hardware; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/12/2019
Qualcomm Adreno 540: Integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC. Slighly optimized architecture compared to the Adreno 530 but with higher clock speed due to the new 10 nm process. In the beginning of 2017 one of the fastest graphics cards for Android based smartphones.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
SD 835: High-End SoC for smartphones that was introduced in early 2017 and manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. Integrates 4x Kryo 280 at 2.45 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at 1.9 GHz (max) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
75.3%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.