Samsung Q210
Specifications

Pricecompare
Average of 16 scores (from 19 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Q210
Source: IT Reviews

Samsung's replacement for the popular Q45, the Q210 shows off Intel's new techology nicely and is a well equipped and performing notebook. And who knows, you just may get to like the 'touch of red'.
Ausstattung gut, Leistung gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2008
Rating: performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: vnunet.com

It won’t suit all tastes or gamers, but this Centrino 2 notebook has a good mix of CPU performance and battery life
(von 5): 4, Ausstattung 4, Leistung 4, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Techradar

The Samsung Q210 is an impressive laptop that packs a host of features into its compact design. As a successor to the Q45, this is a logical progression that makes for a great laptop.
4 von 5, Mobilität sehr gut, Ausstattung sehr gut, Leistung gut, Display schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 90% display: 40% mobility: 90%
Source: CNet

The Q210 is another solid laptop from Samsung. It improves on the Q70 in many ways, offers solid all-round performance and even has good battery life. Anyone in the market for a well-specced portable machine should definitely take a look.
7.8 von 10, Mobilität gut, Verarbeitung gut, Display schlecht
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2008
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 40% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews

Despite some questionable design decisions, the Samsung Q210 continues Samsung's legacy of well balanced and affordable portable laptops thanks to excellent battery life and application performance at a price that won't break the bank.
(von 10): 8, Leistung 9, Ausstattung 8, Mobilität sehr gut
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% features: 80% mobility: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 40% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 3-4/09

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/19/2009
Rating: performance: 90% mobility: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: PC Go - 12/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 11-12/08

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80%
Source: Minitechnet

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Magnus.de

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Connect - 11/08

Comparison, , Long, Date: 10/16/2008
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 78% features: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 82%
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 100% performance: 92% features: 53% ergonomy: 44%
Source: T-Online

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2008
Rating: Total score: 49% price: 100% performance: 92% features: 53% mobility: 53% ergonomy: 44%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2008
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 92% performance: 100% features: 82% display: 72% mobility: 57% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 78%
Source: PCM

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 50% mobility: 80%
Source: PCM

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 40% mobility: 80%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS: Slower clocked 9300M GS and therefore a little bit slower. Supports PureVideo HD (VP3)and Hybrid-SLI (HybridPower and GeForceBoost).
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
P8400:
Middle class dual core CPU with a TDP of 25 Watt. For high end gamer the performance could be not sufficient (for class 1 graphic cards).
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.12.10":
This screen diagoal is quite large for tablets but small for subnotebooks. Some convertibles are also represented with that size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.2 kg:
This weight is typical for very big tablets, subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 11-13 inch display-diagonal.
Samsung: The Samsung Group is composed of numerous international businesses, all united under the Samsung brand in South Korea. The meaning of the Korean word Samsung is "tristar" or "three stars". The Samsung brand is one of the most important brands of South Korea. Samsung is an international notebook manufacturer of medium size according market shares and reviews.
In 2015 and 2016, Samsung had a market share of around 24-25% in the global smartphone market and was undisputed market leader. In the laptop sector, Samsung is on the 8th place in the global manufacturer rankings from 2014-2016 with 1.7-2.7%.
In 2016 Samsung slipped into a crisis due to exploding smartphone batteries and a failed recall action.
75.06%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.