Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2100 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm0.775-1.1V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (20%)     max: 2487 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (6%)     max: 4757 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1158     avg: 1172     median: 1171.5 (14%)     max: 1185 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (7%)     max: 37.24 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 22     avg: 24.2     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T6500 +
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (33%)     max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6500 +
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (4%)     max: 4084 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 02. 10:16:55

#0 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 got single benchmarks 473 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0s ... 0.018s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#50 got single benchmarks 453 +0.026s ... 0.044s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#92 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#94 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)