The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 is an entry level laptop processor based on the Penryn core. It offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6600, the T6670 offers Virtualization VT-x and a higher maximum temperature of 105°C.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 28. 15:29:59
#0 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0.003s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 473 +0.009s ... 0.033s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0.002s ... 0.036s
#10 got single benchmarks 453 +0.045s ... 0.081s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0.002s ... 0.083s
#12 got single benchmarks 467 +0.014s ... 0.097s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.072s ... 0.169s