Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 270

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.

As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.

The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.

Performance

We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

AMD Ryzen 9 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 8945HS, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8745HSAMD Ryzen 9 270
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4900 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7r2/FP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8745HS
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 101 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 696     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 869 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13928     avg: 15082     median: 15082 (14%)     max: 16236 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1598     avg: 1650     median: 1649.5 (69%)     max: 1701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 623     avg: 641     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 658 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5546     avg: 5949     median: 5948.5 (15%)     max: 6351 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2120     avg: 2349     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2578 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 254     avg: 258.5     median: 258.5 (72%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 26.63     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 30.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.01     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.18 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6919     avg: 7109     median: 7109 (43%)     max: 7299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42597     avg: 44583     median: 44583 (32%)     max: 46569 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 73346     avg: 80094     median: 80094 (51%)     max: 86842 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13252     avg: 13560     median: 13559.5 (17%)     max: 13867 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.237     avg: 78.5     median: 78.5 (1%)     max: 86.762 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.895     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.168 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6655     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (11%)     max: 6832 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 61021     avg: 62467     median: 62466.5 (36%)     max: 63912 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6058     avg: 6196     median: 6196 (73%)     max: 6334 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 116.3     avg: 132     median: 132 (44%)     max: 147.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 253.5     avg: 259.5     median: 259.5 (60%)     max: 265.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (37%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 11     avg: 12     median: 12 (31%)     max: 12.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 308     avg: 360     median: 360 (5%)     max: 412 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 197     avg: 223     median: 223 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4716     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4824 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12566     avg: 13889     median: 14260 (30%)     max: 14842 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.327     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.767 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.261     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (1%)     max: 19.501 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
724 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 60822     avg: 75015     median: 81786 (63%)     max: 82438 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 18094     avg: 18883     median: 18786 (46%)     max: 19770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75153     avg: 80190     median: 80377 (65%)     max: 85041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 74475     avg: 79731     median: 80119 (65%)     max: 84598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 82213     avg: 83020     median: 83423 (67%)     max: 83423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17585     avg: 19129     median: 19399 (49%)     max: 20403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 22958     avg: 25619     median: 25815 (46%)     max: 28084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8644     avg: 9841     median: 9408 (40%)     max: 11471 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2439     avg: 2504     median: 2522 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
2524 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9801     avg: 10477     median: 9956 (39%)     max: 11675 Points
12516 Points (49%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1802     avg: 1847     median: 1865 (73%)     max: 1875 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9645     avg: 10037     median: 9864 (18%)     max: 10601 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1733     avg: 1769     median: 1761 (8%)     max: 1813 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9697     avg: 10014     median: 9815 (31%)     max: 10531 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7336     avg: 7475     median: 7430 (74%)     max: 7659 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 40481     avg: 41166     median: 40493 (40%)     max: 42524 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 563     median: 563 (1%)     max: 589 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 233     avg: 242     median: 242 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 282     avg: 286     median: 286 (51%)     max: 290 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1599     avg: 1619     median: 1618.5 (61%)     max: 1638 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.9     avg: 71.7     median: 71.7 (12%)     max: 92.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.5     avg: 76     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.44     avg: 8     median: 8 (5%)     max: 8.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.4     avg: 33.7     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 42 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 270 → 113% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 12. 09:35:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19154 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754984112s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Aug 2025 05:18:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19154 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 19154 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)