Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M is a professional middle class graphics card for mobile workstations (about 15"). It is based on the GeForce GT 330M graphics card with slower clock rates and therefore is a DirectX 10.1 chip that is produced in 40nm. 

Due to a special BIOS and professional drivers, the FX 880M should perform noticeably better than a 330M in professional applications (like CAD, DCC, Rendering). Another advantage for professional users are the certified drivers that should ensure a bug free experience with the most common professional applications. Futhermore, the Quadro FX drivers contain profiles for these applications to ensure the best settings (similar to the game profiles in GeForce cards).

The Quadro FX 880M is also based on the GT216 core in 40nm. The shaders are based on the desktop GTX 200 architecture and therefore a bit improved compared to the previous generation cards.

Without load, the Quadro FX 880M is able to downclock to 135 / 270 / 135 MHz (chip / shader / memory clock).

The gaming performance of the FX 880M should be beyond the GT 330M, because of the different drivers. Gamers should choose a GeForce card because of the better game support.

The chip supports Optimus for automatic switching between dedicated and integrated graphics card (e.g. in the new Core i5 CPUs). Still Optimus was for example not integrated in the Lenovo Thinkpad W510.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M, which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameN10P-GLMNB9E-GLM3
ArchitectureGT2xxG9x
Pipelines48 - unified128 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz550 MHz
Shader Speed1210 MHz1375 MHz
Memory Speed790 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption35 Watt75 Watt
technology40 nm65 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement07.01.2010 14.08.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Transistors754 Million
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2558     avg: 2643     median: 2638.5 (1%)     max: 2735 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
5053 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2128     avg: 2203     median: 2149.5 (2%)     max: 2385 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4326 Points (3%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 28169     avg: 32291     median: 33331 (35%)     max: 34331 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18796     avg: 18980     median: 19002 (10%)     max: 19137 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13154     avg: 13217     median: 13185 (18%)     max: 13298 Points
15759 Points (22%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark 06
min: 6366     avg: 6401     median: 6378 (10%)     max: 6473 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430     avg: 10847     median: 11000 (17%)     max: 11111 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
3DMark 06
6392 Points (10%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
47.8 Points (99%)
25.5 Points (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
47.6 Points (100%)
32 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
60.1 Points (32%)
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
58 Points (86%)
54.6 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
24.4 Points (63%)
22 Points (57%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
34.6 Points (73%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
29.8 Points (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
26.4 Points (54%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 9.18     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (7%)     max: 10.27 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 11.04     avg: 11.2     median: 11.2 (19%)     max: 11.32 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.56     avg: 16     median: 16 (19%)     max: 24.45 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.28     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (22%)     max: 6.21 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.94     avg: 8     median: 8 (6%)     max: 9.09 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.81     avg: 23.8     median: 23.8 (26%)     max: 37.84 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (5%)     max: 10.59 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 8.63     avg: 12.3     median: 12.3 (15%)     max: 15.92 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4809     avg: 4886     median: 4846 (3%)     max: 5002 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4481 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 15.84     avg: 16     median: 16 (6%)     max: 16.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
29.8 fps (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 124% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
129.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
90.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
50.4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
155  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
58.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
30.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
16.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
9.7  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
124.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
35.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
21  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
75.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.8 33.4 ~ 32 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
18.2 20.6 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.7  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
79.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
45.7 47.8 ~ 47 fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
20 39 ~ 30 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
12.8  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.7 60 131 147.3 ~ 100 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
19 19.1 20.5 23 ~ 20 fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
179.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
65.9  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
42.3  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
93.3  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
32.4  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
48.7  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.9  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
225.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
60  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
59.9  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
29.9  fps
131%
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 880M:
28.2  fps
160%
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 146%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 146%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 07:17:18

#0 checking url part for id 1621 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:26:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.045s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 1621 +0.025s ... 0.074s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#27 got single benchmarks 1621 +0.011s ... 0.085s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 885 +0s ... 0.086s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#31 got single benchmarks 885 +0.006s ... 0.092s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.092s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#105 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.105s

#106 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.105s

#107 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.112s

#108 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.112s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#120 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.116s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.117s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.121s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#173 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.131s

#174 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.131s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.175s

#176 return log +0.002s ... 0.177s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)