Notebookcheck Logo
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Powerful gamer with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - RedMagic 11 Pro review

Full throttle.

The RedMagic 11 Pro is one of the first smartphones powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, and it even uses an active cooling fan when needed to squeeze out maximum performance. However, there’s more to it than brute force, and the device brings both notable strengths and familiar weaknesses.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪

Verdict

The RedMagic 11 Pro is one of the few smartphones in its performance class that offers an uninterrupted display and skips the camera bump altogether. Its performance is top-tier, and the gaming features are genuinely impressive.

The downsides are hard to ignore. The device can get uncomfortably hot on its surface, and the internal fan can be extremely loud. There’s also no Wi-Fi 7, no modern Bluetooth 6.0, and no eSIM support.

If these limitations and the short software-update policy don’t bother you, and raw performance is your priority, then this device is the right pick.

Pros

+ High performance
+ No camera bump or display cutout
+ USB 3.2 (Gen 2)
+ Additional sensor buttons

Cons

- Fans can get loud
- The phone gets very hot under heavy load
- No eSIM support
- No Wi-Fi 7

Price and availability

The gaming smartphone can be purchased directly from RedMagic or ordered through Amazon (Germany).

The RedMagic 11 Pro succeeds the RedMagic 10s Pro and stands out primarily thanks to its updated SoC and refreshed design. The battery has also been significantly enlarged, and several new AI features have been added.

The RedMagic 11 Pro starts at €799 for the base storage configuration, but the higher-capacity versions can climb to €999.

Specifications: RedMagic 11 Pro

Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Processor
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 840, Core: 1200 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5T
Display
6.84 inch 19.9:9, 2688 x 1216 pixel 431 PPI, Capacitve Touchscreen, BOE X10, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass, 3000 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 479 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 3.5 mm Audio Jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, OTG, IR-Blaster, Shoulder Trigger Buttons: 520Hz Touch Sampling Rate
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.82 x 76.54 ( = 0.35 x 6.45 x 3.01 in)
Battery
7500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (OV50E40, 1/1.55", 7P, f/1.88, OIS, 23 mm) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, OV50D40, 1/.288", 6P, f/2.0, 14 mm) + 2 MPix; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (OV16A, 1/2.77", 5P, f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, 80W-Charger, USB-Cabel, Clear Case, SIM-Tool, RedMagic OS 11, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L2, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, BiC, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L2, L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | IPX8 | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired), fanless, waterproof
Weight
230 g ( = 8.11 oz / 0.51 pounds), Power Supply: 126 g ( = 4.44 oz / 0.28 pounds)
Price
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and features - No notch and no camera bump on the RedMagic 11 Pro

The RedMagic 11 Pro is available in Cryo (matte black), Nightfreeze (transparent black), and Subzero (transparent silver). Not every color is offered in every storage configuration. The base model comes with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of internal storage, while 16/512 GB and 24/1,024 GB versions are also available.

Build quality is strong, with tight tolerances and a sturdy aluminum frame. The device is protected by an unspecified version of Gorilla Glass and carries an IPX8 water-resistance rating.

A standout feature of the RedMagic 11 Pro is the absence of a camera bump; the camera module sits beneath the rear glass. The front is equally clean, with neither a notch nor a punch-hole. The selfie camera sits invisibly under the display.

Alongside the fast USB 3.2 port, the phone includes multiple configurable LED elements. For wired audio, both a low-noise 3.5 mm jack (SNR: 96.6 dBFS) and a USB-C port are available.

(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

163.82 mm / 6.45 in 76.54 mm / 3.01 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 230 g0.507 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 218 g0.4806 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 219 g0.4828 lbs160.26 mm / 6.31 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 8.39 mm / 0.3303 in 212 g0.4674 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation - RedMagic 11 Pro relies on Wi-Fi 6E

The RedMagic 11 Pro offers solid mobile network support, but a few frequency bands are missing, which limits truly unrestricted international use. The phone also skips modern Wi-Fi 7, sticking instead to Wi-Fi 6E.

As with its predecessor, the two shoulder buttons perform well and offer extensive customization options. For biometric security, the under-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor delivers fast response times and high accuracy. The linear vibration motor rounds things out with precise, punchy haptic feedback.

Networking
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1888 (min: 1822) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1870 (min: 1748) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼79%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼54%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
941 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1389 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1352 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼72%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
712 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
739 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1399 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1888 (1822-1905)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1860 (1748-1884)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)

Software and sustainability - Uncertain update future

Running Google Android 16 with RedMagic UI, the smartphone looks modern and includes its own launcher along with several AI features. Unfortunately, RedMagic provides no concrete information about long-term software support.

There’s also room for improvement on the sustainability side. There are no spare parts, no repair guides, and the packaging relies heavily on plastic.

Cameras – Lacking zoom and lacking flair

Selfie with the RedMagic 11 Pro
Selfie

The RedMagic 11 Pro’s front camera sits under the display with no cutout. While this delivers an uninterrupted viewing experience, image quality is mediocre. Photos and videos look low-contrast and somewhat washed out.

The main camera produces noticeably better results and can even capture solid shots in low light. However, the ultra-wide camera, despite its high resolution, delivers limited detail, and zoom is restricted to digital only.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro: 6.39 ∆E min: 2.99 - max: 11.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.8 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
46.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro: 33.69 ∆E min: 14.54 - max: 50.3 ∆E

Display - Bright and easy on the eyes

The RedMagic 11 Pro’s 6.85-inch AMOLED display delivers an uninterrupted viewing experience and excellent brightness. Even on a full-white screen, it nearly reaches the manufacturer's claimed 1,800 cd/m², and with a smaller white window (APL18), it easily surpasses it. We measured up to 2,375 cd/m². HDR brightness is only slightly lower, although not all HDR standards are supported.

Typical OLED flickering is visible under the oscilloscope, showing a relatively low base frequency of 120 Hz. However, high-frequency PWM dimming and a shallow amplitude curve help reduce the visual strain.

1660
cd/m²
1679
cd/m²
1790
cd/m²
1668
cd/m²
1711
cd/m²
1839
cd/m²
1653
cd/m²
1675
cd/m²
1757
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE X10 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1839 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1714.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.53 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1711 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
CCT: 6478 K
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
AMOLED, 2688x1216, 6.8"
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
0%
-34%
5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1711
1099
-36%
1357
-21%
1846
8%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1715
1067
-38%
1350
-21%
1850
8%
Brightness Distribution (%)
90
95
6%
94
4%
93
3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
1.05
38%
3.1
-82%
1.2
29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
2.38
5%
4.7
-88%
2.9
-16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.7
26%
2.2
4%
2.3
-0%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.232 99%
2 110%
2.25 98%
CCT
6478 100%
6779 96%
6391 102%
6707 97%

* ... smaller is better

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3177 cd/m² +38%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² +21%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2296 cd/m²
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3192 cd/m² +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² +10%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2375 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 17 %
Secondary Frequency: 2083 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

Grayscale (Mode: Standard, Color temperature: Normal, Target color space: DCI-P3)
Grayscale (Mode: Standard, Color temperature: Normal, Target color space: DCI-P3)
Colors (Mode: Standard, Color temperature: Normal, Target color space: DCI-P3)
Colors (Mode: Standard, Color temperature: Normal, Target color space: DCI-P3)
Color space (mode: Standard, color temperature: Normal, target color space: DCI-P3)
Color space (mode: Standard, color temperature: Normal, target color space: DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6065 ms rise
↘ 0.644 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6065 ms rise
↘ 0.7155 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
outdoors
outdoors
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance, emissions and battery life - Hot potatoes

Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the RedMagic 11 Pro delivers undeniably high performance, helped along by its active cooling system. The internal fan can ramp up to 24,000 RPM, and you can definitely hear it when it does.

Despite the cooling, surface temperatures still climb sharply, which can become uncomfortable during longer gaming sessions.

Battery life is very good overall, although the significantly larger battery had us expecting even longer runtimes. In testing, the smartphone recharged fully in just 67 minutes.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3741 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=6)
3660 Points -2%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3640 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2959 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2309 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)
1754 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11634 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=6)
11154 Points -4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10620 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8711 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8154 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)
5128 Points -56%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=93, last 2 years)
2777 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
30553 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
26614 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (23088 - 30553, n=5)
26162 Points -14%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
23088 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22957 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30553, n=194, last 2 years)
11163 Points -63%
Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8140 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6289 - 8329, n=6)
7156 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6845 Points -16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
6289 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5907 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8140, n=196, last 2 years)
2956 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
8004 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6907 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6168 - 8004, n=5)
6864 Points -14%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
6168 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6036 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8004, n=195, last 2 years)
2943 Points -63%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
107 fps +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=5)
93.4 fps +56%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=209, last 2 years)
59.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
289 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (203 - 350, n=6)
275 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
248 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
237 fps -18%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
203 fps -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 332, n=209, last 2 years)
117 fps -60%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
100 fps +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (60 - 120, n=5)
92 fps +53%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
88 fps +47%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=210, last 2 years)
47.5 fps -21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
116 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
107 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (65 - 145, n=6)
106.2 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
94 fps -19%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
65 fps -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 129, n=209, last 2 years)
45.4 fps -61%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
52 fps +13%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
46 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (35 - 51, n=5)
45 fps -2%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43 fps -7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
35 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 53, n=210, last 2 years)
21.2 fps -54%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=51, last 2 years)
846 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=5)
613 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
545 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524 Points -4%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=51, last 2 years)
3901 Points +578%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=5)
577 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
575 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
486 Points -15%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=51, last 2 years)
5559 Points +416%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=5)
1196 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1077 Points
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
974 Points -10%
CrossMark
Overall
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2495 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2441 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2495, n=5)
2170 Points -13%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1858 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=130, last 2 years)
1139 Points -54%
Productivity
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1979 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1959 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1951 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1380 - 2038, n=5)
1776 Points -9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1491 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 - 2084, n=130, last 2 years)
1078 Points -45%
Creativity
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1881 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1838 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1746 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1357 - 1838, n=5)
1658 Points -10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1452 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 - 1962, n=130, last 2 years)
1006 Points -45%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
13042 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12907 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6210 - 12907, n=5)
9227 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
7763 Points -40%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
7512 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 - 13042, n=130, last 2 years)
2562 Points -80%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
315.056 Points +129%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
243.318 Points +77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
154.8 Points +13%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
137.426 Points
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
70.142 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (70.1 - 146.2, n=4)
115.8 Points -16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
109.286 Points -20%
Nubia RedMagic 11 ProXiaomi 17 Pro MaxSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraXiaomi Poco F7 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-26%
-19%
-18%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4035.9
3971.4
-2%
3823.28
-5%
4002.68
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3728.82
3899.9
5%
3361.24
-10%
3464.43
-7%
3282 ?(1240 - 4035, n=20)
-12%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
575.62
548.4
-5%
287.85
-50%
311.24
-46%
379 ?(279 - 576, n=20)
-34%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
537.11
561.3
5%
331.61
-38%
411.78
-23%
Max. Load
 55.4 °C
132 F
55.2 °C
131 F
52 °C
126 F
 
 54.6 °C
130 F
54.1 °C
129 F
52.7 °C
127 F
 
 54.5 °C
130 F
53.7 °C
129 F
50.8 °C
123 F
 
Maximum: 55.4 °C = 132 F
Average: 53.7 °C = 129 F
45.3 °C
114 F
50 °C
122 F
54 °C
129 F
46.8 °C
116 F
48.3 °C
119 F
54.1 °C
129 F
46.3 °C
115 F
48.2 °C
119 F
52.4 °C
126 F
Maximum: 54.1 °C = 129 F
Average: 49.5 °C = 121 F
Power Supply (max.)  27.7 °C = 82 F | Room Temperature 21.6 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.1 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
80.4 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
64.6 % -20%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
60.3 % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.5 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.1 % -12%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.2 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % -34%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
83.6 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
74.5 % -11%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.7 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -41%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
82.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
70.8 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % -39%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø38.1 (37.2-46.8)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.7 (24.7-37.8)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (21.9-41.9)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.8 (25.4-36.2)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø152.1 (140.4-174.6)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø93.1 (81.6-135.4)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø99.3 (82.3-127.5)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø42.1 (39.3-47.6)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.5 (22.5-41.5)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø40.2 (37.7-45.1)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.3 (25.3-36.3)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26 (19.8-39.8)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (24.9-33.4)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø20.3 (18.7-22.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (10-19.8)
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.3)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.935.72535.4363127.534.14028.431.95029.835.86323.235.58019.534.210019.435.612520.140.916017.656.520018.455.625015.555.231512.755.440011.457.250012.966.363011.767.480011.372.9100012.277.7125013.180.1160015.180.8200013.183.125001381.3315013.381.3400013.380.5500013.375.2630013.667.5800013.662.41000013.660.51250013.767.3160001462.5SPL25.490.7N0.776.8median 13.3median 67.4Delta1.111.538.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic 11 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143)
25h 20min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
7500 mAh
25.3 h
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
33.8 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
22.2 h
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
5300 mAh
18.4 h

Notebookcheck overall rating

The RedMagic 11 Pro presents itself as a high-performance gaming smartphone with useful additional features, but like its predecessors, it suffers from potentially high heat buildup.

In the test: RedMagic 11 Pro
In the test: RedMagic 11 Pro

Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro - 11/24/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 97%
Weight
88%
Battery
94%
Display
92%
Games Performance
53 / 55 → 95%
Application Performance
86 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
36%
Temperature
54%
Noise
65%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
74%
Average
59%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
96.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29.3%

Possible alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86.7%
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Nubia RedMagic 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Nubia RedMagic 1...
2. $9.90
Anbzsign 2 Pack for ZTE Nubi...
3. $9.99
Case for Nubia RedMagic 11 P...
List Price: 799€
230 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.84"
2688x1216
431 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.19
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen...
2. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
3. $7.63
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 940€
219 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $919.50
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
3. $1,120.00
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
85.3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $579.99
XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L...
2. $11.99
Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U...
3. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P...
List Price: 800€
212 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.67"
3200x1440
526 PPI
Flow AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Powerful gamer with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - RedMagic 11 Pro review
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-11-27 (Update: 2025-11-27)