Notebookcheck Logo

AMD PRO A12-9830B vs AMD FX-8800P vs AMD A8-8600P

AMD PRO A12-9830B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9830B

The AMD PRO A12-9830B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business variant of the FX-9830P. The A12-9830B / FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9830B is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P/A12-9800B). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9830B with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

AMD FX-8800P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-8800P

The AMD FX-8800P is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A8-8600P

► remove from comparison AMD A8-8600P

The AMD A8-8600P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC that contains two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). Compared to the faster A10-8700P, the A8-8600P features a slower clocked CPU and GPU.

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. The faster Carrizo models gain about 35% in 3DMark 11 depending on the cTDP and results for the A8-8600P model should be similar.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD PRO A12-9830BAMD FX-8800PAMD A8-8600P
CodenameBristol RidgeCarrizoCarrizo
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-8800P « 2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P « 1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3000 - 3700 MHz2100 - 3400 MHz1600 - 3000 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP45 Watt35 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com
SocketFP4 BGAFP4 BGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 207     avg: 255.3     median: 277 (2%)     max: 282 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 78     avg: 81.3     median: 82 (23%)     max: 84 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.53     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (4%)     max: 3.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 1 (23%)     max: 0.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2417     avg: 2604     median: 2604 (16%)     max: 2791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6820     avg: 7860     median: 7860 (6%)     max: 8900 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
377.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
12 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1543 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.1 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
93.5 fps (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4227 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.1 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
874 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10073     avg: 10092     median: 10091.5 (8%)     max: 10110 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2363     avg: 2764     median: 2753.5 (7%)     max: 3187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24378     avg: 30901     median: 32521 (26%)     max: 34183 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2106     avg: 2720     median: 2843 (7%)     max: 2943 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4031     avg: 4119     median: 4119 (7%)     max: 4207 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2085 Points (41%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6719 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2218 Points (33%)

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-8800P → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 01. 17:16:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8550 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6843 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 6846 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751382977s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8550 +0s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 8550 +0s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6843 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#11 got single benchmarks 6843 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 6846 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 6846 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.031s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.031s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)