Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium P6000 vs Intel Pentium P6200

Intel Pentium P6000

► remove from comparison Intel P6000

The Intel Pentium P6000 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 1.68 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Pentium series had).

Compared to the Celeron P4500, the P6000 offers a bit better performance due to the faster System Bus and an increased Level 3 cache. However, VT-x is not available for the P6000.

The P6000 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 766MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is relatively low, because of the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller.

Intel Pentium P6200

► remove from comparison Intel P6200

The Intel Pentium P6200 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 2.13 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Pentium series had).

The P6200 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 667MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is a bit limited due to the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller and small improvements in the core.

ModelIntel Pentium P6000Intel Pentium P6200
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Pentium Arrandale
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P62002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6000 « 1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5400 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6300 compare2.27 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6200 « 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P6100 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium P60001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5600 compare1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Intel Pentium U5400 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores3 MB L3
Clock1860 MHz2133 MHz
FSB48002500
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketPGA988PGA988
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 P6200 +
0.7 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2046     avg: 2051     median: 2050.5 (12%)     max: 2055 Points
min: 2389     avg: 2404     median: 2394 (14%)     max: 2428 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3900     avg: 3940     median: 3939.5 (3%)     max: 3979 Points
min: 4594     avg: 4619     median: 4620 (3%)     max: 4643 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4885 Points (3%)
min: 5763     avg: 5773     median: 5773 (4%)     max: 5783 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2541 Points (3%)
min: 2987     avg: 2997     median: 2996.5 (4%)     max: 3006 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1130     avg: 1138     median: 1138 (13%)     max: 1146 s
min: 987     avg: 1031     median: 1031 (12%)     max: 1075 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.7     avg: 36.1     median: 36.1 (7%)     max: 36.5 s
min: 31.1     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (7%)     max: 33.84 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1625     avg: 1635     median: 1638 (3%)     max: 1642 Points
min: 1396     avg: 1812     median: 1949 (4%)     max: 1954 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (5%)     max: 23.7 s
min: 20.4     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (4%)     max: 20.75 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 54.2     median: 54.2 (2%)     max: 54.4 s
min: 46.88     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (2%)     max: 48.17 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15150     avg: 16135     median: 16135 (8%)     max: 17120 MIPS
19570 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 10740     avg: 11370     median: 11370 (9%)     max: 12000 MFLOPS
13850 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P6000 +
min: 3929     avg: 4640     median: 4639.5 (10%)     max: 5350 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.4 Points (69%)
5.8 Points (74%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium P6000 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium P6200 → 112% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 24. 07:23:06

#0 checking url part for id 1096 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1507 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1721798586 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:15:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1096 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 1096 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1507 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 1507 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.032s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)