Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA NVS 3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA NVS 3100M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia NVS 3100M or Nvidia Quadro NVS 3100M is a business graphics card that is based on the GT218 core (e.g. GeForce G210M / 310M) but with drivers that are optimized for stability and compatibility in business applications).

Therefore, it is an entry level graphics card with low 3D performance that should be sufficient for low end games and demanding games in very low detail settings and resolutions. For example the old FEAR ran on a G210M in medium to high details fluently. Still, because of the "business drivers" and the slightly lower clock rate, the gaming performance of the NVS3100M may be worse.

The NVS 3100M supports PureVideo HD (with Video Processor VP4) to decode HD videos in the formats H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP using the GPU. This helps reducing the CPU load and should lead to higher battery runtimes when viewing HD videos.

The chip should also support CUDA and DirectX Compute to access the computing power of the graphics card for general tasks (like encoding a video).

The power consumption of approx. 14 Watt (TDP of G210M) is relatively high for a business notebook, but compared to integrated graphic cards, the NVS 3100M should still provide more 3D performance.

NVIDIA Quadro K500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro K500M

The NVIDIA Quadro K500M is an entry-level, DirectX 11.1-compatible graphics card for mobile workstations. It is a Kepler-based GPU built on the GK107 architecture and is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC. Compared to the K2000M, the K500M only features a 64-Bit memory bus and 192 shader cores instead of 384. The Quadro K500M is built for the Intel Chief River generation (Ivy Bridge) and is the successor to the Fermi-based Quadro 1000M (Huron River platform).

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

Architecture

The Kepler architecture is the successor to the Fermi architecture that first appeared in laptops with the GeForce 400M series. The GK107 Kepler core offers two shader blocks, called SMX, each with 192 shaders for a total of 384 shader cores that are clocked at the same speed as the central core. The K500M, however, offers only one SMX with 192 shaders. Although more shader cores are available in the Kepler architecture as compared to the Fermi design, the Kepler shaders are still expected to be up to twice as power efficient. However, due to the missing hot clock of the shader domain, two shaders of a Kepler chip are about as fast as one shader of a Fermi chip (as the latter is clocked twice as fast).

PCIe 3.0 is now supported by the mobile Kepler series and an optional Turbo mode can automatically overclock the Nvidia card by a theoretical 15 percent if the laptop cooling system allows it. The implementation of this boost mode is done in the BIOS, but it is ultimately dependent upon the manufacturer of the laptop.

Performance

The gaming performance should be similar to the consumer GeForce GT 620M.

Features

The improved feature set now includes support for up to 4 active displays. Furthermore, high resolution monitors of up to 3840x2160 pixels can now be connected using DisplayPort 1.2 or HDMI 1.4a if available. HD-Audio codecs, such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD, can be transmitted via bitstream mode through the HDMI port. However, as most laptops will feature Optimus, the integrated GPU will likely have direct control over the display ports and may limit the feature set available by the Nvidia Kepler cards.

The 5th generation PureVideo HD video processor (VP5) is also integrated in the GK107 core and offers hardware decoding of HD videos. Common codecs such as MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264 and VC1/WMV9 are fully supported up to 4K resolutions while VC1 and MPEG-4 are supported up to 1080p. Two streams can be decoded in parallel for features such as Picture-in-Picture. Another novelty is the inclusion of a dedicated video encoding engine similar to Intel QuickSync that can be accessed by the NVENC API.

The power consumption of the K500M is rated at 35 Watt (TGP according to Nvidia) and therefore suited for medium-sized notebooks of 15-inches or greater.

NVIDIA NVS 3100MNVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K Series
NVS 4200M compare 48 @ 0.81 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 3100M 16 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 2100M compare 16 @ 0.54 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro K5100M compare 1536 @ 0.77 GHz256 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Quadro K5000M compare 1344 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K4100M compare 1152 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K4000M compare 960 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K3100M compare 768 @ 0.71 GHz256 Bit @ 3200 MHz
Quadro K3000M compare 576 @ 0.65 GHz256 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K2100M compare 576 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 3000 MHz
Quadro K1100M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 2800 MHz
Quadro K620M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Quadro K2000M compare 384 @ 0.75 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K1000M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
Quadro K610M compare 192 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 2600 MHz
Quadro K510M compare 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 2400 MHz
Quadro K500M 192 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameN10M-NSN14M-Q1
ArchitectureGT2xxKepler
Pipelines16 - unified192 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz850 MHz
Shader Speed1470 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, DDR3DDR3 / GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption14 Watt35 Watt
technology40 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement07.01.2010 01.06.2012
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Transistors1.3 Billion
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Information118mm2, CUDA, OpenCL 1.2, OpenGL 4.3

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1101     avg: 1120     median: 1120.5 (0%)     max: 1135 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 853     avg: 868     median: 869.5 (0%)     max: 874 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 22322     avg: 23582     median: 23455.5 (24%)     max: 25093 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 9254     avg: 10238     median: 10487 (5%)     max: 10700 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6461     avg: 6928     median: 7046.5 (8%)     max: 7106 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
3DMark 06
3698 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
3DMark 06
min: 3216     avg: 3261     median: 3257 (4%)     max: 3294 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
3DMark 06
min: 3484     avg: 3626     median: 3676 (5%)     max: 3719 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
2.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
5.3 fps (4%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
4.5 fps (3%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
7.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
4 fps (2%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
3.3 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 5.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (75%)     max: 6 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.9     avg: 4.4     median: 4.5 (56%)     max: 5 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2888     avg: 3556     median: 3374.5 (2%)     max: 4340 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA NVS 3100M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 8.07     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (3%)     max: 8.56 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA NVS 3100M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
NVS 3100M:
32 41 ~ 37 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
25  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
40 58 58 ~ 52 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
NVS 3100M:
11 12 ~ 12 fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
NVS 3100M:
119 132 ~ 126 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
54 61 ~ 58 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
NVS 3100M:
30 42 ~ 36 fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
54 56 ~ 55 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
19 20 ~ 20 fps
high 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
10 11 ~ 11 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
48 50 ~ 49 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
19 20 ~ 20 fps
high 1024x768
100%
NVS 3100M:
9.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA NVS 3100M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA NVS 3100Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Colin McRae: DIRT 23725
Anno 14045212
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare1265836
Crysis - GPU Benchmark552011
Crysis - CPU Benchmark49209.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4

1
3
1

2
1

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 09:20:53

#0 checking url part for id 1622 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3239 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 16 May 2024 05:40:59 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.11s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.11s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1622 +0.027s ... 0.137s

#8 got single benchmarks 1622 +0.028s ... 0.165s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3239 +0.001s ... 0.166s

#10 got single benchmarks 3239 +0s ... 0.166s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.166s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.173s ... 0.339s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.339s

#14 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.343s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.343s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.346s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.357s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.357s

#19 return log +0.044s ... 0.401s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)