Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2830 vs Intel Celeron N2807

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2830

► remove from comparison Intel N2830

The Intel Celeron N2830 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2830 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2830 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2850. Therefore, the N2830 even competes with older dual core CPUs like the Core 2 Duo SU9400. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 750 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2807
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2160 - 2410 MHz1580 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt4.3 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2830Intel Celeron N2807
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
65 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (8%)
35 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
0.5 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.45 Points
0.3 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (7%)
min: 1088     avg: 1178     median: 1184.5 (10%)     max: 1241 Points
986 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (3%)
min: 2145     avg: 2253     median: 2239.5 (3%)     max: 2356 Points
2093 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (3%)
3340 Points (3%)
3047 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
1783 Points (10%)
1584 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2807 +
1763 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2807 +
57.4 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2807 +
408 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2807 +
3.2 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2807 +
17 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2807 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2910 +
1612 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2910 +
27 s (6%)
97%
1 N2807 +
38.8 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2910 +
61 s (3%)
99%
1 N2807 +
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 s (7%)
99%
1 N2807 +
1806 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 970     avg: 1018     median: 1027 (3%)     max: 1052 Points
95%
1 N2807 +
976 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
min: 10142     avg: 10740     median: 10610 (7%)     max: 11180 Points
6368 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
min: 812     avg: 846     median: 850 (2%)     max: 877 Points
548 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 1557     avg: 1569     median: 1565 (3%)     max: 1589 Points
70%
1 N2807 +
1089 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 891     avg: 908     median: 909 (18%)     max: 928 Points
76%
1 N2807 +
688 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2910 +
2001 Points (16%)
112%
1 N2807 +
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2910 +
1743 Points (16%)
113%
1 N2807 +
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2910 +
2189 Points (4%)
64%
1 N2807 +
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2910 +
2544 Points (5%)
62%
1 N2807 +
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2910 +
2205 Points (6%)
75%
1 N2807 +
1658 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4141     avg: 4944     median: 4482 (5%)     max: 6996 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 319     avg: 432.7     median: 375 (4%)     max: 592 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2830 +
min: 4542     avg: 6715     median: 7211 (7%)     max: 7397 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2830 → 103% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 82% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 09:14:24

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5684 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5682 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.014s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.017s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.009s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5684 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 5684 +0.02s ... 0.048s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 5682 +0s ... 0.048s

#15 got single benchmarks 5682 +0.008s ... 0.056s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.057s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.076s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.078s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#66 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.083s

#67 return log +0s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)