, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-T880 MP2 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP4

ARM Mali-T880 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP2

The ARM Mali-T880 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P20 SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP4

The ARM Mali-T880 MP4 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the HiSilicon Kirin 950. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP4 version features 4 clusters/cores.

The MP4 version that is used in the HiSilicon /Huawei SoC is clocked with up to 900 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805) and PowerVR GX6450 (Apple A8). However, the Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420 pulls ahead thanks to its 8 clusters. Still, the Mali-T880MP4 offers enough power for demanding Android games in Full HD.

Thanks to the 16nm process in the Kirin 950, the Mali-T880 can be used in smartphones like the Huawei Mate 8.

ARM Mali-T880 MP2ARM Mali-T880 MP4
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)Midgard (4th Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (4rd-gen)Midgard (4rd-gen)
Pipelines2 - unified4 - unified
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
technology16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)
Date of Announcement26.11.2015 26.11.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...
CPU in Mali-T880 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P258 x 2600 MHz1000 MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67578 x 2300 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.900 - 1000 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9558 x 2500 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9508 x 2300 MHz? MHz900 MHz
MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X10 x 2600 MHz? MHz875 MHz
min. - max.? - 1000 MHz780 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 10023     avg: 13267     median: 13844 (2%)     max: 14288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6839     avg: 8665     median: 9269 (1%)     max: 9283 Points
98665 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 10498     avg: 11431     median: 11898 (2%)     max: 11898 Points
10624 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 556     avg: 620     median: 633 (2%)     max: 647 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 21     avg: 23.1     median: 24 (0%)     max: 24 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 21     avg: 28     median: 31 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
4.5 fps (3%)
min: 2.4     avg: 3.2     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 4.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.5 fps (1%)
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
7.4 fps (4%)
min: 3.8     avg: 5.1     median: 4 (2%)     max: 7.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
4.2 fps (1%)
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (1%)     max: 7.2 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 9655     avg: 9936     median: 9935.5 (23%)     max: 10216 Points
min: 16610     avg: 16649     median: 16649 (38%)     max: 16688 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 18345     avg: 19359     median: 19359 (43%)     max: 20373 Points
min: 29659     avg: 29661     median: 29660.5 (66%)     max: 29662 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3868     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (4%)     max: 4072 Points
min: 6747     avg: 6960     median: 6988 (7%)     max: 7145 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1046     avg: 1086     median: 1085.5 (2%)     max: 1125 Points
min: 1344     avg: 1469     median: 1516 (3%)     max: 1548 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4599 (100%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 177% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps 25 fps ~ 25 fps
med.
Mali-T880 MP4:
24 fps  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
high
Mali-T880 MP4:
42 fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 fps 57 ~ 46 fps
98%
Mali-T880 MP4:
30 34 44 56 60 ~ 45 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
90%
Mali-T880 MP4:
20 27 30 30 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
high
Mali-T880 MP4:
29 fps  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
52  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP4 → 96%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 03. 17:11:38

#0 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7170 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:21:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0.024s ... 0.068s

#8 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.019s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7170 +0s ... 0.087s

#10 got single benchmarks 7170 +0.019s ... 0.106s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.12s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.12s

#14 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.131s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.131s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.131s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.135s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.135s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)