Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T830 MP3 vs Qualcomm Adreno 510

ARM Mali-T830 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP3

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the Samsung Exynos 7880 in the beginning of 2017. The chip features three clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-T860 MP2 and therefore all typical Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 in the Exynos 7880 is manufactured in 14 nm and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

Qualcomm Adreno 510

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 510

The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.

Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.

ARM Mali-T830 MP3Qualcomm Adreno 510
Adreno 500 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 compare 1
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 compare @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology16 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement01.04.2016 15.12.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
ArchitectureAdreno 500
CPU in Mali-T830 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78808 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM89768 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM89566 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
13314 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
1180 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
1074 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
746 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
643 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
5.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
9.1 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
15 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
34 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44.8 fps (74%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
6078 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2559 Points (4%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4270 Points (93%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 119% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
163%
Adreno 510:
30 50 57 60 ~ 49 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
29  fps
93%
Adreno 510:
20 29 30 30 ~ 27 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 119%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 163%

ARM Mali-T830 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










Qualcomm Adreno 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 249
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 13. 12:27:16

#0 checking url part for id 7686 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:40:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.072s ... 0.073s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.073s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.073s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7686 +0.025s ... 0.098s

#8 got single benchmarks 7686 +0.007s ... 0.105s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.002s ... 0.107s

#10 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.038s ... 0.145s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.145s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.066s ... 0.211s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.211s

#14 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.216s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.216s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.217s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.222s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.222s

#19 return log +0.039s ... 0.262s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)