LG G7 One
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.9, 26mm
Average of 2 scores (from 11 reviews)
Reviews for the LG G7 One
Source: Mobile Syrup
Had it come in at about $600 upfront, The G7 One would have been a no-brainer option for Canadian consumers looking to buy a smartphone with great features at a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority
In terms of pricing, the less beefy specs in the G7 One should make a sizeable difference to the MSRP. LG said in a press release both it and the G7 Fit are “priced exceptionally,” but didn’t say what that price was.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
The LG G7 One is LG’s first foray into Android One and it’s a decent attempt. Those who have tried, or have got, the LG G7 ThinQ will notice the phones are practically the same, except for a few under-the-hood reductions. But this is all about Android One and the clean-cut OS shines on this handset.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2018
Source: Pocket Lint
The LG G7 One is an interesting device. It delivers a good design, great display and pure, uninterrupted software, along with decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2018
Source: GSM Arena
LG launched a new color version of the premium LG G7 ThinQ called Raspberry Rose. It has a glossy finish on its glass back, same as the old colors (so no frosted glass here). Note that this version is available only on some carriers.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN
Positive: Decent cameras; good speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2018
Source: Geekbecois FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 30% performance: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geekbecois FR→EN
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/21/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN
Positive: Stylish design; great built quality; good hardware. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2018
CommentQualcomm Adreno 540: Integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC. Slighly optimized architecture compared to the Adreno 530 but with higher clock speed due to the new 10 nm process. In the beginning of 2017 one of the fastest graphics cards for Android based smartphones. Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
835: High-End SoC for smartphones that was introduced in early 2017 and manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. Integrates 4x Kryo 280 at 2.45 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at 1.9 GHz (max) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
LG Electronics Inc. is a subsidiary of the LG Group. LG is the world's second-biggest maker of televisions and third-biggest maker of mobile phones. With its headquarters in South Korea, the company has 75 subsidiaries worldwide that design and manufacture televisions, home appliances, and telecommunications devices. LG is an international laptop manufacturer of medium size with few reviews.
After a few years, LG largely withdrew from the laptop sector. In the smartphone segment, LG is a medium-sized manufacturer (not among the Top 5 in 2015 and 2016).
75%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.