, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

HiSilicon Kirin 620

► remove from comparison  Kirin 620

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is an ARM-based octa core SoC for mid-range smartphones. It was announced at the end of 2014 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores at 1.2 GHz (max.). Furthermore, the processor integrates a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card, an LPDDR3 memory controller, an LTE Cat.4 modem, 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 28nm and relatively power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 930

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 930 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

HiSilicon Kirin 620HiSilicon Kirin 930HiSilicon Kirin 650
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
1200 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
8 / 88 / 88 / 8
28 28 16
ARMv8-ISA, Mali-450 MP4, LTE (Cat. 4), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.0 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-450 MP4ARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 6531     avg: 6885     median: 6884.5 (4%)     max: 7238 Points
9337 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 6434     avg: 6917     median: 6916.5 (7%)     max: 7399 Points
min: 9404     avg: 9487     median: 9499 (10%)     max: 9557 Points
11640 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 6861     avg: 7534     median: 7533.5 (8%)     max: 8206 Points
min: 10447     avg: 10528     median: 10494 (11%)     max: 10643 Points
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (14%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2151     avg: 2453     median: 2452.5 (4%)     max: 2754
min: 3458     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (5%)     max: 3537
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 541     avg: 565     median: 564.5 (11%)     max: 588
min: 864     avg: 873     median: 872.5 (18%)     max: 881
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (18%)     max: 906
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2955     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (6%)     max: 3468
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 698     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (16%)     max: 823
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
166 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 272.043     avg: 272     median: 272.3 (9%)     max: 272.482 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
52 MFLOPS (5%)
min: 120.972     avg: 122     median: 121.5 (12%)     max: 122.028 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 15866     avg: 17376     median: 17375.6 (29%)     max: 18885.1 ms
min: 9903     avg: 11085     median: 11543.5 (19%)     max: 11807.9 ms
min: 9111.2     avg: 9254     median: 9253.9 (16%)     max: 9396.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1373.1     avg: 1679     median: 1679.4 (18%)     max: 1985.6 ms
min: 1021.4     avg: 1093     median: 1092.5 (12%)     max: 1163.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1857     avg: 2170     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 2483 Points
min: 3866     avg: 4211     median: 4084 (6%)     max: 4682 Points
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4756 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
907 Points (24%)
1254 Points (34%)
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1104 Points (25%)
2044 Points (46%)
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1146 Points (15%)
2756 Points (36%)
3356 Points (44%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
13277 points (31%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 30558     avg: 32403     median: 32402.5 (33%)     max: 34247 Points
min: 45927     avg: 47313     median: 47313 (48%)     max: 48699 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
52322 Points (18%)
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1338 Iter./s (41%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20284 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
125047 Points (16%)
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3717 Points (19%)
min: 4358     avg: 4432     median: 4458 (22%)     max: 4479 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 930 → 156% n=10

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 176% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 24. 21:23:38

#0 checking url part for id 6667 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6663 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6667 +0s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 6667 +0.008s ... 0.064s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6663 +0s ... 0.064s

#10 got single benchmarks 6663 +0.008s ... 0.072s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0s ... 0.072s

#12 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.008s ... 0.08s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.103s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)