, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

HiSilicon Kirin 930

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 930 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

HiSilicon Kirin 930HiSilicon Kirin 650
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
2000 MHz2000 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
28 16
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.0 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
9337 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9404     avg: 9487     median: 9499 (10%)     max: 9557 Points
11640 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 10447     avg: 10528     median: 10494 (11%)     max: 10643 Points
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (14%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2955     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (6%)     max: 3468
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 698     avg: 761     median: 760.5 (16%)     max: 823
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3458     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (5%)     max: 3537
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 864     avg: 873     median: 872.5 (18%)     max: 881
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (18%)     max: 906
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 272.043     avg: 272     median: 272.3 (9%)     max: 272.482 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 120.972     avg: 122     median: 121.5 (12%)     max: 122.028 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9903     avg: 11085     median: 11543.5 (19%)     max: 11807.9 ms
min: 9111.2     avg: 9254     median: 9253.9 (16%)     max: 9396.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1021.4     avg: 1093     median: 1092.5 (12%)     max: 1163.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3866     avg: 4211     median: 4084 (6%)     max: 4682 Points
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4756 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1254 Points (34%)
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
2044 Points (46%)
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
2756 Points (36%)
3356 Points (44%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
13277 points (31%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 45927     avg: 47313     median: 47313 (48%)     max: 48699 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
52322 Points (18%)
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1338 Iter./s (41%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20284 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
125047 Points (16%)
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4358     avg: 4432     median: 4458 (22%)     max: 4479 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 930 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 112% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 18:50:46

#0 checking url part for id 6663 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6663 +0s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 6663 +0.009s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.007s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.076s

#12 return log +0.028s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)