HP EliteBook Folio G1-V1C64EA
Specifications
HP EliteBook Folio G1-V1C64EA (EliteBook Folio Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2c/4t 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB
, DDR4-2133 SDRAM (1 x 8 GB)
Display
12.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, FHD, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB SSD
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 DisplayPort
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12 x 292 x 209 ( = 0.47 x 11.5 x 8.23 in)
Battery
38 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Additional features
Keyboard Light: yes, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.1 kg ( = 38.8 oz / 2.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Links
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
price: - %, performance: 90%, features: 80%, display: 90% mobility: 80%, workmanship: 100%, ergonomy: - %, emissions: - %
Reviews for the HP EliteBook Folio G1-V1C64EA
Test, recenzja, opinia – HP EliteBook Folio G1 (V1C64EA) – W małym ciele wielka moc!
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 90% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 515: Integrated GPU (GT2) with 24 EUs found on Core-m-CPUs of the Skylake generation (4,5 W TDP).
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
6Y54: Skylake-based ULV dual-core processor for tablets and 2-in-1 notebooks. Offers an integrated HD Graphics 515 GPU and is manufactured in 14 nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Add as a preferred source on Google
