HP Compaq Mini 701eg
Average of 9 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the HP Compaq Mini 701eg
Hoidy-Toidy. If you are familiar with the term "netbook", the first thing you probably think of is the Asus Eee PC. Actually, there is a whole series of netbooks from other brands that also have their good qualities. For those who like well designed netbooks, the HP Compaq Mini 701eg should stand out in front of the crowd, since it looks, in comparison to some more clumsy colleagues, extremely good. How the chic netbook scored in an extensive review, you can read here.
Source: Trusted Reviews
There's an interesting sub-plot to the netbook craze that 99.9 per cent of consumers have no idea about. It all concerns market share and a battle between what we can now consider the big three of PC manufacturing: Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Acer. Acer, the challenger to HP and Dell's hegemony, has gone into netbooks in a big way, leading the market as a result. And, though Dell and HP have made a lot of noise, they actually hold a relatively small part of this market. This is partly deliberate, large manufacturers have been wary of cannibalising sales of more profitable mainstream notebooks, but with netbooks seemingly here to stay, both have started to treat the segment a little more seriously. An attractive netbook with an outstanding keyboard, the HP Compaq Mini 700 is only let down by compromises that aren't present in similarly priced and better featured competitors. It is fine for casual use, but more demanding users will find it a little half-baked.
70, Preis 70, Leistung 70, Ausstattung 70
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 70%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 36% features: 54% display: 87% mobility: 74% workmanship: 88%
Source: e-media - 10/09
Comparison, , Long, Date: 06/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 60% mobility: 40% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2009
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 60% performance: 70% features: 70% display: 92% mobility: 61% ergonomy: 93%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 50% features: 10% display: 50% mobility: 30% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/16/2009
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 52% display: 78% mobility: 86% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 84% emissions: 80%
Source: mobile Zeit - 2/09
Single Review, online available, Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 90%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/22/2008
Rating: emissions: 90%
Source: PCM NL→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/27/2009
Rating: Total score: 80% display: 50% mobility: 60%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games). These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
Power efficient, cheap and slow Netbook single core CPU. Because of the in-order execution, the performance per MHz is worse than Core Solo or Celeron M processors.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This is a typical display size for tablets and small convertibles.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
HP: The Hewlett-Packard Company, founded 1935, commonly referred to as HP, is a technology corporation headquartered in California, United States. HP specializes in developing and manufacturing computing, storage, and networking hardware, software and services. Major product lines include personal computing devices, enterprise servers, related storage devices, as well as a diverse range of printers and other imaging products. Other product lines, including electronic test equipment and systems, medical electronic equipment, solid state components and instrumentation for chemical analysis. HP posted US $91.7 billion in annual revenue in 2006, making it the world's largest technology vendor in terms of sales. In 2007 the revenue was $104 billion, making HP the first IT company in history to report revenues exceeding $100 billion.
Up to 2015, the company was named Hewlett Packard Company. After a split, the computer range was renamed to HP Inc.
In the laptop segment, HP was the world's largest manufacturer from 2014 to 2016 with a market share of 20-21% from 2014 to 2016, but they only exceed Lenovo by a small margin as of recently. HP is not present in the smartphone sector (as of 2016).
73.44%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.