Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

The NVidia GeForce GTX 260M is a high-end graphics card of the 200M series based on the G92b core. Therefore, the 55nm chip is essentially a 9800M GTX with slightly higher clock rates (550/1375/950 vs. 500/1250/800). As a result, the 260M is more similar to the desktop 9800GT than the GTX 260.

As with all native DirectX 10 cards, the GeForce GTX 260M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel shaders and vertex shaders have been replaced with 112 stream processors in the 260M, which now take over most of the graphics workload. The shader units themselves are also clocked higher (1375 MHz) than the core chip.

In general, the performance of the GTX 260M is somewhat higher than the 9800M GTX due to the higher clock speed. For current DirectX 10 games such as Crysis, World in Conflict, Bioshock or Age of Conan, the 260M is sufficient for gameplay under medium to high detail settings. Meanwhile, older games should be able to run fluently under high resolutions and full details. VRAM can be up to 1024 MB GDDR3 at 950MHz  in MXM 3.0 or 800MHz in MXM 2.0.

The GeForce GTX 260M integrates the PureVideo HD video decoder. The GPU is thus able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 videos.

HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technology that allows users to switch between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. In the future, Nvidia intends to evolve the software for automatic switching depending on the active application (now known as Optimus). GeForceBoost is not supported with the GTX 260M as there would be no performance gain from combining with the integrated GPU.

The high current consumption of up to 75 Watts (of the entire MXM board) means that the GTX 260M can typically only be found in larger notebooks with loud and powerful cooling systems.

Compared with Desktop graphics cards, the GTX 260M is most similar to the GeForce 9800 GT.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a graphics solution that combines two Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M cards in an SLI setup. As not every game supports SLI efficiently, the performance increase compared to a single card is only about 0-40%. The most frequently used technique is Alternate Frame Rendering (AFR), where one card renders every odd frame while the second card renders every even frame. Due to the SLI setup, users may experience micro stuttering due to the irregular delays between sequential frames.

Each of the two GeForce GTX 280M is based on the G92b core and is produced in 55nm. It features the full 128 pipelines of the G92b and is therefore more comparable to the desktop 9800M GTX+ than the desktop GTX 280.

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M SLI is bundled with the GeForce 9400M G chipset (for laptops based on the Core 2 Duo) and therefore supports HybridPower if supported by the manufacturer. With HybridPower, both GTX cards can be disabled and only the chipset graphics core can run, leading to longer battery life (and possibly less fan noise). Modern Core i7 laptops use an Intel chipset and do not support HybridPower.

Since there are two GTX 280 cards active in SLI, the electric current consumption and exhumed heat are about twice as much as what a single GTX 280M can produce. Due to the large power and cooling requirements, this SLI combination is usually reserved for large desktop replacement (DTR) laptops (like the Alienware M17x).

show full text
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce GTX 200M Series
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M compare 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M compare 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M compare 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M compare 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
CodenameN10E-GTN10E-GTX
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines112 - unified256 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz585 MHz
Shader Speed1375 MHz1463 MHz
Memory Speed950 MHz950 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption75 Watt150 Watt
Transistors754 Million1.5 Billion
technology55 nm55 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX readyHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.03.2009 02.03.2009
InformationMXM 3MXM 3
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4080     avg: 4953     median: 4901 (4%)     max: 5686 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
min: 8728     avg: 9435     median: 9435 (8%)     max: 10142 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3840     avg: 4316     median: 4207 (3%)     max: 5058 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
min: 9649     avg: 9947     median: 9946.5 (8%)     max: 10244 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32699     avg: 34053     median: 34304 (36%)     max: 34905 Points
min: 37453     avg: 38453     median: 38453 (40%)     max: 39453 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 27301     avg: 29794     median: 30595.5 (16%)     max: 30685 Points
min: 57010     avg: 57553     median: 57552.5 (30%)     max: 58095 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 12669     avg: 14773     median: 15079 (21%)     max: 16611 Points
min: 19180     avg: 19268     median: 19267.5 (27%)     max: 19355 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10370 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
min: 9458     avg: 10167     median: 10064 (15%)     max: 11209 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
min: 14340     avg: 15019     median: 15000 (23%)     max: 15717 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10075 Points (15%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
10.2 Points (21%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
12.3 Points (26%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
15.5 Points (33%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
20.9 Points (11%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
10 Points (20%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
11 Points (16%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
3.4 Points (9%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
5 Points (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.8 Points (85%)
5.9 Points (87%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
5.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3702     avg: 3966     median: 3917 (17%)     max: 4425 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
min: 4835     avg: 5197     median: 5197 (22%)     max: 5559 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (10%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI → 149% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
45  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
43.8  fps
StarCraft 2

StarCraft 2

2010
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
154  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47  fps
Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Battlefield: Bad Company 2

2010
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
54.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
23.2  fps
CoD Modern Warfare 2

CoD Modern Warfare 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
137.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
59.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
55.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
40  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.3 80.3 ~ 66 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.3 50.5 ~ 46 fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31.7 36.5 ~ 34 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
26.9  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
66.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
39.1  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
35.3  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
125.2 133 ~ 129 fps
81%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
105  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.2 39 44 49.5 ~ 42 fps
90%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
37.6  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
313  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
312  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105  fps
138%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
145  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
89  fps
135%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
120  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
132 151.2 ~ 142 fps
137%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
180 208.8 ~ 194 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
86.5 89 91.1 ~ 89 fps
143%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
127.5  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
63.8 65 67.4 73.4 77.4 ~ 69 fps
174%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
116.9 123.1 ~ 120 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.8  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
57.9  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
46.1 65.4 ~ 56 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
48  fps
94%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
44.6 45.2 ~ 45 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.7  fps
133%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
35.5 62.2 ~ 49 fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
107 135.8 ~ 121 fps
136%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
165  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
69 85.8 103.3 111.7 ~ 92 fps
113%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
104  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
91.6  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
50.8  fps
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
73  fps
ultra 1024x768
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
35  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105 111.9 ~ 108 fps
153%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
122 208.8 ~ 165 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5 72 75.1 ~ 70 fps
149%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
81 127.5 ~ 104 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.7 53 56.2 59.1 ~ 55 fps
176%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
77 116.9 ~ 97 fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
211.3  fps
112%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
237.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
95.2 168.8 ~ 132 fps
133%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
175.3  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.8 67.3 77.8 88.5 ~ 72 fps
156%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
105.9 119 ~ 112 fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
77.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
53.4  fps
126%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
67.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49.2  fps
131%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
64.6  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92 123.7 ~ 108 fps
98%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
102.6 108.5 ~ 106 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
56 57.2 76.9 ~ 63 fps
102%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
64.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31 38 38.4 39.3 41.9 ~ 38 fps
139%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
52 53.2 ~ 53 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
12.2  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
110 129.5 ~ 120 fps
103%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
123.5 124.8 ~ 124 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49 52.6 76.9 ~ 60 fps
109%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
65.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
30.7 35.5 37 37 39.2 ~ 36 fps
131%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
41.3 53.2 ~ 47 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
11.5  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47 72 ~ 60 fps
78%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
47  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
38 42 ~ 40 fps
185%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
74  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
22.7 26.6 27.2 ~ 26 fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
158  fps
83%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
130.8  fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
62  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
267  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.8  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
52  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
121 270 ~ 196 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
217.1  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
178  fps
121%
GeForce GTX 280M SLI:
215.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
575  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI → 124%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 111%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 11:17:31

#0 checking url part for id 1111 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1122 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.084s ... 0.084s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.086s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.086s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.087s

#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.087s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 1111 +0.032s ... 0.118s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.119s

#15 got single benchmarks 1111 +0.018s ... 0.137s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 1122 +0s ... 0.137s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.139s

#19 got single benchmarks 1122 +0.006s ... 0.145s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.145s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.145s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.146s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.146s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.147s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.148s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.149s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.15s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.15s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.151s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.152s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.154s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.155s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.155s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.156s

#96 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.156s

#97 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.156s

#98 Got 161 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.169s

#99 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.169s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.169s

#108 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.174s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.175s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.175s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.176s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.176s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.177s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.178s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.179s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.179s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.18s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.18s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.18s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.181s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.181s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.181s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.181s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.182s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.183s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.184s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.184s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.185s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.185s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.186s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.187s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.189s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.19s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.191s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.192s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.192s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.193s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#229 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.193s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.194s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.194s

#245 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.194s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.195s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.195s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.195s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.195s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.195s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.195s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.196s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.196s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.196s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.197s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.198s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.198s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.198s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.2s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.2s

#261 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.201s

#262 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.201s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.202s

#264 return log +0.002s ... 0.204s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)