Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7904 vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Samsung Exynos 7904

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7904

The Samsung Exynos 7904 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2019 and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. Compared to the older and faster Exynos 7885, the 7904 offers a slower clocked A73 cores (1.8 versus 2.2 GHz).

It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

HiSilicon Kirin 620

► remove from comparison  Kirin 620

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is an ARM-based octa core SoC for mid-range smartphones. It was announced at the end of 2014 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores at 1.2 GHz (max.). Furthermore, the processor integrates a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card, an LPDDR3 memory controller, an LTE Cat.4 modem, 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 28nm and relatively power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison  Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

ModelSamsung Exynos 7904HiSilicon Kirin 620HiSilicon Kirin 650
SeriesSamsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 78852.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B1.56 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 « 1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1800 MHz1200 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm28 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-450 MP4, LTE (Cat. 4), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G71 MP2ARM Mali-450 MP4ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 7904
0.2 pt (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 6531     avg: 6885     median: 6884.5 (6%)     max: 7238 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12500 Points (10%)
min: 6434     avg: 6917     median: 6916.5 (6%)     max: 7399 Points
11640 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12321     avg: 12706     median: 12747 (11%)     max: 13009 Points
min: 6861     avg: 7534     median: 7533.5 (6%)     max: 8206 Points
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (11%)     max: 13676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1657     avg: 1708     median: 1710 (20%)     max: 1755 Points
1440 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1677     avg: 1712     median: 1713 (20%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
239 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
596 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
273 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1010 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1268     avg: 1306     median: 1320 (13%)     max: 1329 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4017     avg: 4073     median: 4096 (4%)     max: 4105 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1247 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3799 Points (6%)
min: 2151     avg: 2453     median: 2452.5 (4%)     max: 2754 Points
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1263 Points (19%)
min: 541     avg: 565     median: 564.5 (8%)     max: 588 Points
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (13%)     max: 906 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
598 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1860 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7368 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3613 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4275 Points (11%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
166 MFLOPS (6%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
52 MFLOPS (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3703     avg: 4610     median: 4515.5 (5%)     max: 5707 ms
min: 15866     avg: 17376     median: 17375.5 (20%)     max: 18885 ms
min: 9111     avg: 9254     median: 9254 (11%)     max: 9397 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1373     avg: 1680     median: 1679.5 (18%)     max: 1986 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7798     avg: 8407     median: 8372 (8%)     max: 9087 Points
min: 1857     avg: 2170     median: 2170 (2%)     max: 2483 Points
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (4%)     max: 4756 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 43     avg: 50.8     median: 52 (11%)     max: 56 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
907 Points (24%)
1434 Points (38%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1104 Points (25%)
1965 Points (44%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1146 Points (15%)
3356 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 30558     avg: 32403     median: 32402.5 (33%)     max: 34247 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 71303     avg: 73318     median: 73318 (25%)     max: 75333 Points
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 2712     avg: 5838     median: 6029.5 (19%)     max: 8580 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 27074     avg: 30317     median: 31150.5 (38%)     max: 31891 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 21269     avg: 22734     median: 23138.5 (7%)     max: 23389 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 45380     avg: 46822     median: 46737 (29%)     max: 48432 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 101367     avg: 105710     median: 105782 (19%)     max: 109906 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
23506 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
27124 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
6105 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
49105 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105840 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 131628     avg: 133094     median: 133094 (18%)     max: 134560 Points
142543 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
4.5 MB/s (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
72.8 MB/s (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
13.9 MB/s (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
259.3 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
4843 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5089 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2527     avg: 2548     median: 2547.5 (13%)     max: 2568 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 4371     avg: 5078     median: 5077.5 (11%)     max: 5784 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5269     avg: 5372     median: 5372.5 (35%)     max: 5474 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5802     avg: 6452     median: 6542 (33%)     max: 6923 Points
3717 Points (19%)
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7904 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 → 56% n=7

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 86% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 16. 11:24:32

#0 checking url part for id 11376 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6667 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.086s ... 0.088s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.088s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11376 +0.016s ... 0.104s

#8 got single benchmarks 11376 +0.013s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6667 +0.003s ... 0.12s

#10 got single benchmarks 6667 +0.009s ... 0.129s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0.003s ... 0.132s

#12 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.01s ... 0.143s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.229s ... 0.372s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.372s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)