Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2100 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G

Samsung Exynos 2100 5G

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 2100 5G

The Samsung Exynos 2100 5G is a high end SoC with 8 cores in three clusters (1x Exynos X1 2.9 GHz/ 3x Cortex-A78 2.8 GHz/ 4x A55 2.2 GHz) and a integrated ARM Mali-G78MP14 GPU (+40% faster versus Mali-G77MP11). Integrates a 5 G modem with up to 7.35 Gbps (5G NR Sub-6Hz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL). The chip supports single cameras with up to 200 MP or dual-cameras with 32 MP each, UFS v3.1 stsorage and LPDDR5 memory. Videos can be decoded up to 8K60 in 10-bit HEVC or 30fps in VP9/AV1. Encoding is supported in 8K30 HEVC and VP9. For AI calculations the Exynos 2100 integrates a triple core NPU and DSP. The chip is manufactured in 5LPE at Samsung.

The processor performance in our tests with the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is slightly below the Snapdragon 888 (numbers from the Qualcomm own test device) but clearly higher than the old Snapdragon 865+. Compared to Apple, the single thread performance is similar to the old Apple A12. Multi-thread-performance is better and between the A13 and current A14 CPU. All in all, the Exynos 2100 should be the second fastest SoC for Android devices and only slightly behind the Snapdragon 888 in CPU performance. Therefore, all demanding applications should run easily on the 2100.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888+ 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ (Plus) 5G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2021 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. 

Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 3 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 5G is now included in the chip with the Snapdragon X60 modem.

Compared to the older Snapdragon 888, the 888+ offers a slightly higher clocked prime core (+160 MHz) and a 23% faster Hexagon 790 DSP. Therefore, it is now the fastest Android SoC (at the time of announcement), but still slightly slower (CPU and GPU) than the Apple A14 and A15 Bionic SoCs.

ModelSamsung Exynos 2100 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameExynos X1 / Cortex-A78 / A55Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Clock2200 - 2900 MHz1800 - 3000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G78MP14 GPU, 26 TOPS NPU, AV1 Decoder for 8K Video, 200 Megapixel ISPAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi, LPDDR5-6400 (3200 MHz) Memory Controller (64 Bit)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G « 1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
L3 Cache3 MB
TDP5 Watt
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 660

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 2100 5G
min: 1.205     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (93%)     max: 1.3 pt
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 888+ 5G
1.3 pt (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 48010     avg: 52262     median: 52859 (45%)     max: 55917 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4137     avg: 4485     median: 4651 (55%)     max: 4668 Points
min: 4387     avg: 4898     median: 4952 (58%)     max: 5260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4483     avg: 4586     median: 4585.5 (52%)     max: 4688 Points
min: 4365     avg: 4994     median: 5260 (60%)     max: 5293 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1003     avg: 1070     median: 1100 (46%)     max: 1106 Points
min: 1076     avg: 1143     median: 1157 (49%)     max: 1170 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3228     avg: 3392     median: 3364 (6%)     max: 3583 Points
min: 3286     avg: 3572     median: 3628.5 (7%)     max: 3675 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1164 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3699 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4970 Points (50%)
min: 4754     avg: 4973     median: 4973 (50%)     max: 5192 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
14476 Points (16%)
min: 12433     avg: 13553     median: 13552.5 (15%)     max: 14672 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4995 Points (68%)
5255 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14525 Points (35%)
13602 Points (33%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11441 Points (18%)
11320 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3557 Points (53%)
3977 Points (60%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4334 Points (35%)
3422 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7958 Points (72%)
5554 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
21472 Points (42%)
18052 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
10064 Points (20%)
8716 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
13062 Points (34%)
10821 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1744     avg: 1780     median: 1786 (2%)     max: 1810 ms
min: 1117.9     avg: 1267     median: 1253.5 (1%)     max: 1443 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
313.2 ms (3%)
342.5 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25656     avg: 27059     median: 27275 (25%)     max: 28247 Points
min: 28695     avg: 38237     median: 37604 (34%)     max: 49046 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 102     avg: 116     median: 114 (24%)     max: 132 Points
min: 120     avg: 144     median: 147 (31%)     max: 165 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 79207     avg: 81028     median: 79290 (66%)     max: 84588 Points
min: 108609     avg: 111028     median: 111506 (93%)     max: 112968 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 108128     avg: 109723     median: 109437 (88%)     max: 111603 Points
min: 97862     avg: 106258     median: 102389 (83%)     max: 118523 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 249459     avg: 257337     median: 260710 (48%)     max: 261841 Points
min: 297329     avg: 308231     median: 306570 (56%)     max: 320795 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 163370     avg: 168955     median: 167237 (60%)     max: 176257 Points
min: 181327     avg: 186005     median: 184740 (67%)     max: 191947 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 600164     avg: 617042     median: 617805 (60%)     max: 633158 Points
min: 695964     avg: 711522     median: 712952 (69%)     max: 725649 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
749520 Points (45%)
min: 794271     avg: 813105     median: 815115 (49%)     max: 829929 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
199585 Points (55%)
min: 196860     avg: 203592     median: 205863 (56%)     max: 208053 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4771 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
31127 Points (49%)
min: 28905     avg: 32530     median: 31947 (51%)     max: 36738 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
14339 Points (66%)
min: 12136     avg: 15268     median: 15403 (71%)     max: 18567 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
9635 Points (51%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
26688 Points (57%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12255     avg: 13368     median: 13486 (88%)     max: 14362 Points
12692 Points (83%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 15718     avg: 16412     median: 16741 (84%)     max: 16777 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
846 Points (32%)
min: 828     avg: 872     median: 872 (33%)     max: 916 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.68     avg: 5.3     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.41 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.943     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.244 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2100 5G → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G → 103% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 18:09:29

#0 checking url part for id 13115 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13833 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13115 +0.012s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 13115 +0.012s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13833 +0.008s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 13833 +0.024s ... 0.083s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.18s ... 0.263s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.294s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)