Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Samsung Exynos 1280

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1280

The Samsung Exynos 1280 is a midrange system on a chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in early 2022 and is used in the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. The CPU part integrates two clusters, a performance cluster with two ARM Cortex-A78 cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and an efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x.

Furthermore, the chip integrates an ISP for cameras with up to 108 MPixel. The integrated ARM Mali G68 MC4 supports displays with up to 1080p and 120Hz.

One of the main features is the integrated 5G modem that supports Sub-6GHz (2550/1280 Mbps), mmWave (1840/920 Mbps), and LTE Cat 18 (1200/200 Mbps). WiFi 5 is the highest supported standard, as is Bluetooth 5.2.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 5nm process at Samsung.

MediaTek Dimensity 800

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800

The Mediatek Dimensity 800 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 4 core ARM Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller(up to 16 GB with 2133 MHz), a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the similar named Dimensity 800U, the 800 offers two more big A76 cores but clocked 400 MHz lower. This means the single core performance is lower, but the multi-core performance can be better.

The Dimensity 800 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800U

The Mediatek Dimensity 800U is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.4 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the Dimensity 820, the 800U offers lower clocked A76 cores and a slower GPU.

The Dimensity 800U is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelSamsung Exynos 1280MediaTek Dimensity 800MediaTek Dimensity 800U
SeriesSamsung Exynos
Series: Exynos
Samsung Exynos 25001.8 - 3.3 GHz10 / 10 cores
Samsung Exynos 1280 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2000 MHz2000 - 2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology5 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesAI NPU, 5G NR Sub-6GHz Modem, GNSS, 4k30 Video En- and Decoding, Wifi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.2, FM Radio4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP4ARM Mali-G57 MP4ARM Mali-G57 MP3
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800
0.8 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800U
0.6 pt (49%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
21499 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3035     avg: 3147     median: 3111 (29%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 3626     avg: 4027     median: 4026.5 (38%)     max: 4427 Points
min: 3205     avg: 3320     median: 3259 (31%)     max: 3497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2997     avg: 3083     median: 3073 (35%)     max: 3187 Points
min: 3593     avg: 4024     median: 4024 (46%)     max: 4455 Points
min: 3095     avg: 3281     median: 3236 (37%)     max: 3512 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 961     avg: 968     median: 966 (24%)     max: 976 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 2021     avg: 2078     median: 2061 (8%)     max: 2152 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 736     avg: 745     median: 740 (29%)     max: 767 Points
523 Points (20%)
min: 596     avg: 600     median: 599 (23%)     max: 606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1826     avg: 1955     median: 1968 (4%)     max: 2045 Points
2143 Points (4%)
min: 1776     avg: 1785     median: 1779.5 (3%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3367     avg: 3376     median: 3376 (34%)     max: 3385 Points
2524 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7648     avg: 7739     median: 7738.5 (8%)     max: 7829 Points
8649 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3257     avg: 3258     median: 3257.5 (36%)     max: 3258 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7308     avg: 7358     median: 7357.5 (11%)     max: 7407 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6437     avg: 7250     median: 7249.5 (11%)     max: 8062 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2600     avg: 3032     median: 3032 (45%)     max: 3464 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4054 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4655 Points (42%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12938 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6203 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8035 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1243.5     avg: 1518     median: 1287.1 (2%)     max: 1920.3 ms
3490 ms (4%)
min: 3013     avg: 3669     median: 3298 (4%)     max: 4695 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 24159     avg: 29314     median: 32436 (25%)     max: 32736 Points
14751 Points (11%)
min: 9999     avg: 14917     median: 16629 (13%)     max: 18123 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 106     avg: 109.7     median: 109 (30%)     max: 114 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 69     avg: 117.8     median: 107.5 (19%)     max: 187 Points
56 Points (10%)
min: 45     avg: 50     median: 47 (8%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
59479 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
49330 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
89187 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
99879 Points (36%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
297875 Points (29%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 398969     avg: 414640     median: 409976 (20%)     max: 434975 Points
366649 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 106625     avg: 117011     median: 120812 (30%)     max: 123596 Points
103228 Points (26%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 459194     avg: 467559     median: 468630 (16%)     max: 474853 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 149202     avg: 151352     median: 150455 (4%)     max: 154399 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4737 Points (1%)
23814 Points (3%)
min: 3336     avg: 12939     median: 12938.5 (2%)     max: 22541 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 42.2     avg: 44.8     median: 43.7 (30%)     max: 48.5 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 94.2     avg: 105.8     median: 109.4 (3%)     max: 113.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 34.9     avg: 35.1     median: 35 (17%)     max: 35.3 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 439     avg: 458.7     median: 466 (13%)     max: 471 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 15671     avg: 17297     median: 17445 (8%)     max: 18177 Points
17258 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11077     avg: 12301     median: 12053.5 (44%)     max: 13748 Points
min: 7087     avg: 7337     median: 7337 (27%)     max: 7587 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5515 Points (29%)
3228 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
18991 Points (41%)
19054 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9824 Points (64%)
min: 7511     avg: 7913     median: 7913 (52%)     max: 8315 Points
min: 8738     avg: 9893     median: 9892.5 (65%)     max: 11047 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10884 Points (54%)
min: 9674     avg: 9817     median: 9816.5 (49%)     max: 9959 Points
min: 10527     avg: 13283     median: 13283 (66%)     max: 16039 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 579     avg: 593     median: 598 (22%)     max: 601 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.77     avg: 5.5     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 7.03 Watt
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.112     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.378 Watt
1.1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1280 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800 → 120% n=12

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800U → 84% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 05. 08:08:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14516 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13001 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12955 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751695693s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14516 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 14516 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13001 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 13001 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12955 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 12955 +0.005s ... 0.028s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.036s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.061s

#18 return log +0s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)