AMD E-350 vs AMD E2-2000 vs AMD E-450

AMD E-350

► remove

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-2000

► remove

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

AMD E-450

► remove

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-350AMD E2-2000AMD E-450
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
» AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1750 MHz1650 MHz
128 KB128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
102%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (13%)     max: 0.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (11%)     max: 1064 Points
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (11%)     max: 1077 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080 Points
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (3%)     max: 2082 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (3%)     max: 2250 Points
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (3%)     max: 2299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (11%)     max: 1158 Points
103%
1 E-450 +
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (11%)     max: 1180 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 seconds
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 seconds
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 seconds
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.623 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (5%)     max: 499 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (7%)     max: 1033 Points
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (7%)     max: 1070 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 Seconds
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.688 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 Seconds
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 105     avg: 107     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 Seconds
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
97%
1 E-450 +
9480 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
100%
1 E-450 +
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 points
103%
1 E-450 +
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (3%)     max: 1998 Points
95%
1 E-450 +
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (3%)     max: 2123 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (3%)     max: 690 points
115%
1 E-450 +
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (3%)     max: 721 points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)