AMD E-350 vs AMD E2-2000

AMD E-350

► remove

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-2000

► remove

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

AMD E-350AMD E2-2000
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1650 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1500 MHz1 / 1
» AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1500 MHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1750 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (11%)     max: 1064
min: 1029     avg: 1048.3     median: 1048.5 (11%)     max: 1064
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (3%)     max: 2250 Points
min: 2034     avg: 2181.8     median: 2195.5 (3%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (10%)     max: 1158 Points
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (10%)     max: 1158 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 s
min: 2054     avg: 2129.9     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 s
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (7%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 985     avg: 1015.9     median: 1021 (7%)     max: 1033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
min: 2409.83     avg: 2465.9     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
min: 9290     avg: 9646.7     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (3%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1818     avg: 1932.7     median: 1982 (3%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (3%)     max: 690 Points
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (3%)     max: 690 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-2000 → 100% n=16

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)