, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E-350 vs AMD E-450

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-350AMD E-450
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1650 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (10%)     max: 0.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (9%)     max: 1064
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (9%)     max: 1077
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (3%)     max: 2082
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (2%)     max: 2299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (8%)     max: 1158 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (8%)     max: 1180 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 s
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 s
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.623 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (3%)     max: 499
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (6%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (6%)     max: 1070 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.688 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
min: 105     avg: 107     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
9480 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (2%)     max: 2123 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (3%)     max: 721 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 101% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 18. 22:04:46

#0 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 May 2021 13:07:50 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.031s ... 0.037s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.021s ... 0.059s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.078s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.104s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)