Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Average of 3 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Doogee S50
All in all, I was very impressed with the Doogee S60 when I road tested it last year. The streamlined S50, for its nicer form factor, facial unlocking, and easy SIM insertion, is a better piece of hardware -- despite the lack of toolbox apps in this build.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
The Doogee S50 will appeal to those looking for a rugged smartphone that can double as a ruthlessly capable snapper. With four cameras and 53 megapixels in total, this is a surprisingly good alternative to our traditional favorites.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN
Positive: Support waterproof IP68; long battery life; powerful hardware. Negative: Weak hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2018
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% performance: 75% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 65%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2: Integrated GPU that can be found e.g. in the Mediatek Helio P23 SoC with 700 or 770 MHz clock speed. Supports OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1 and RenderScript.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Helio P23 MT6763T: ARM-based octa core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 1.65 GHz for power efficiency and 4x Cortex-A53 at 2.3-2.5 GHz) for smartphones and tablets.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for smartphones.
Doogee Mobile Limited Company produces smarpthones under the Doogee brand. Their products have first been reviewed from 2015 and only sporadically. The ratings are below-average (as of 2016).
78.33%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.