CAT S52
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 12 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the CAT S52
The CAT S52 has slimmed down considerably so that it no longer passes for a chubby outdoor phone but more for a fancy smartphone with special skills. However, only a small battery fits into the well-protected case. In the review, we look at how this affects the suitability for everyday use.
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionWith an eye beyond just the building site, the Cat S52 is a good-looking device that’s equally aimed at butter-fingered mainstream users as much as those who work in extreme conditions. It’s easily the most aesthetically pleasing work phone out there, and there are no major corners cut when it comes to durability. However, its middling performance and dated screen will make it a hard sell for regular users at this price point.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Girl
Archive.org versionThe sceptic in me wondered if it was really as good as they said it was, and so, I decided to have a little bit of fun. This is a review of the CAT S52 Smartphone, but it is, hopefully, like no review you’ve seen before. The idea was to have fun while also giving the phone a really hard time.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/11/2020
Source: What Hi-Fi
Archive.org versionThe S52 largely does what it sets out to do. As a mid-range device, you’d definitely find it lacking were it not for its rugged specs, which manage to successfully merge mainstream design with beefy defence-against-the-element capabilities. It especially proved its worth when it survived 10 minutes in a jug without being made fully watertight, and came away with some temporary camera damage.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2020
Rating: price: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: [link] Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: Android User
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/16/2020
Source: PCtipp.ch
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbase
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2019
Source: Heute
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/17/2019
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 70% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: PC Guia
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70%
Source: GadgetGear.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Testers
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Premium design; great built quality; powerful hardware; high performance; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2019
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Lyd og Billede
DA→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio P35 MT6765: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


