Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-8500P vs AMD FX-9830P vs AMD Pro A12-8800B

AMD A6-8500P

► remove from comparison AMD A6-8500P

The AMD A6-8500P is a low-end Carrizo APU (6th APU generation) of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC that contains one Excavator CPU modules (with 2 integer and 1 FP units counted as 2 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 4 compute cores (256 shaders), a DDR3-1600 memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). 

Due to the single module configuration, the A6-8500P is a lot slower than the other Carrizo models with two modules (four cores). While the single thread performance should be similar to a Core i3-4030U, the Multi-Threading scores are only comparable to a Celeron N2940. For low demanding tasks like office and web-browsing, the performance however should be sufficient. 

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

AMD Pro A12-8800B

► remove from comparison AMD Pro A12-8800B

The AMD Pro A12-8800B is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for business laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). It is similar to the consumer version, the FX-8800P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (based on the similar FX-8800P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU. See more benchmarks on our FX-8800P page.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD A6-8500PAMD FX-9830PAMD Pro A12-8800B
CodenameCarrizoBristol RidgeCarrizo
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Carrizo
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P « 1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B « 2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 3000 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz2100 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt45 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
SocketFP4 BGAFP4 BGA
FeaturesHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
301 Points (2%)
min: 202     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (1%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
93 Points (26%)
min: 71     avg: 73.3     median: 72 (20%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.6 Points (5%)
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.58 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (26%)
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3033 Points (18%)
min: 2183     avg: 2236     median: 2236 (14%)     max: 2289 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9822 Points (7%)
min: 6009     avg: 6220     median: 6219.5 (5%)     max: 6430 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 7270     avg: 8224     median: 8224 (5%)     max: 9178 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3015     avg: 3057     median: 3057 (4%)     max: 3099 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
315.9 s (4%)
min: 502     avg: 517     median: 516.5 (6%)     max: 531 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.3 s (2%)
min: 16.19     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 16.79 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1336     median: 1336 (2%)     max: 1379 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15.84     avg: 15.9     median: 15.8 (5%)     max: 15.85 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72     avg: 75.9     median: 75.9 (17%)     max: 79.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (8%)
min: 0.195     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.205 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
min: 0.313     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.328 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
min: 1.5     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (4%)     max: 1.6 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2715     avg: 2871     median: 2769 (6%)     max: 3130 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.6 s (4%)
min: 19     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.7 s (2%)
min: 42     avg: 43.9     median: 43.9 (2%)     max: 45.77 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
870 s (4%)
min: 898     avg: 935     median: 934.5 (4%)     max: 971 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6609     avg: 6624     median: 6623.5 (5%)     max: 6638 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2228     avg: 2375     median: 2361 (6%)     max: 2536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
34521 Points (28%)
min: 23849     avg: 24509     median: 24550 (20%)     max: 25128 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
31580 Points (26%)
min: 21853     avg: 23645     median: 23645 (19%)     max: 25437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
34398 Points (29%)
min: 25429     avg: 25705     median: 25705 (21%)     max: 25981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2945 Points (7%)
min: 1779     avg: 1920     median: 1850 (5%)     max: 2130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
min: 2293     avg: 2639     median: 2560 (5%)     max: 3064 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4691 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1969 Points (38%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4949 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2079 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2093     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (4%)     max: 4211 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
123.5 ms (1%)
min: 139.7     avg: 165.4     median: 165.4 (2%)     max: 191 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
7621 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A12-8800B → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 07:12:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7089 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 7007 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751087532s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7089 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 7089 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7007 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#13 got single benchmarks 7007 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.038s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)