Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-4400M vs AMD A6-5357M vs AMD A4-5145M

AMD A6-4400M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-4400M

The AMD A6-4400M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.7 GHz CPU (up to 3.2 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a Radeon HD 7520G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a dual-core processor, the A6-4400M includes only one module with two integer-cores and one floating-point core. As a result, the CPU is not a true dual-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A6-4400M performs similar to the Llano-based A4-3330MX. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intels Pentium-series, the A6-4400M offers less performance in most cases. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office and Internet browsing, but will reach its limits in more demanding applications.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7520G offers only 192 shader cores of the Trinity chip (7660G: 384) and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 497 to 686 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7520G GPU should be somewhere between the Llano-based Radeon HD 6620G and the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A6-4400M APU is rated at 35 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to dual-core Ivy Bridge processors. Consequently, the A6-4400M is best suited for 14-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A6-5357M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5357M

The AMD A6-5357M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A6-5350M, the A6-5357M is a BGA version. As successor to the A6-4400M, the A6-5350M/5357M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.9 to 3.5 GHz, the A6-5357M should perform about 15 percent faster than the A6-4400M and just reach a Pentium P6100. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8450G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7520G at 533 - 720 MHz. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is expected to match a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A4-5145M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5145M

The AMD A4-5145M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.0 to 2.6 GHz, a Radeon HD 8310G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A4-5145M should be similar to the A6-4455M and the Pentium 977. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8310G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). The core is clocked at 424-554 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

ModelAMD A6-4400MAMD A6-5357MAMD A4-5145M
CodenameTrinityRichlandRichland
SeriesAMD AMD A-SeriesAMD AMD A-SeriesAMD AMD A-Series
Series: AMD A-Series Richland
AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4500M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-4400M « 2.7 - 3.2 GHzcores
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHzcores
AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHzcores
AMD A4-4355M1.9 - 2.4 GHzcores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M « 2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M « 2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2700 - 3200 MHz2900 - 3500 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors1303 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size246 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
SocketBGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.98     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1829     avg: 2225     median: 2292 (14%)     max: 2384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3096     avg: 3344     median: 3407 (2%)     max: 3413 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 4161     avg: 4482     median: 4589 (3%)     max: 4590 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2948     avg: 3063     median: 3069.5 (4%)     max: 3165 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1399     avg: 1528     median: 1520.5 (18%)     max: 1673 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42     avg: 47.1     median: 46.8 (9%)     max: 52.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1070     avg: 1353     median: 1353 (2%)     max: 1636 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.6 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
38.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0778 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.128     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.135 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.63     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.689 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1781     avg: 1800     median: 1804 (4%)     max: 1811 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 31     avg: 32.7     median: 31.6 (7%)     max: 36.48 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 70     avg: 73.3     median: 70.9 (3%)     max: 81.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1798     avg: 1848     median: 1806.5 (8%)     max: 1980 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
18210 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12380 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 5.5     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (72%)     max: 5.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3183     avg: 3308     median: 3304 (3%)     max: 3451 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1193     avg: 1380     median: 1403 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13531 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1004 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-4400M → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 05. 16:13:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3101 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4157 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 4160 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759673587s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3101 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 3101 +0.008s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4157 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 4157 +0s ... 0.019s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4160 +0s ... 0.019s

#13 got single benchmarks 4160 +0s ... 0.019s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.03s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)