Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A12Z Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)

Apple A12Z Bionic

► remove from comparison Apple A12Z Bionic

The Apple A12Z Bionic is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the iPad Pro 11 and 12.5-inch from 2020. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power efficiency cores (up from the 6 cores in the A12 of the iPhone XS). The difference to the older Apple A12X Bionic in the iPad Pro 2018 models seems to be an additional GPU core. Regarding CPU Apple noted: "Enhanced thermal design means higher peak and longer sustained performance". More details were not published by Apple, so it may be even the same chip with an additional enabled GPU core. On the other hand, it could be also manufactured in an improved 7nm (EUV?) process and offer higher clock rates. As Apple states no performance improvements on the CPU side, we don't expect big gains. However, the A12X was a very fast ARM based SoC and currently there is no competitor in the Android space that should beat the performance.

The chip also includes the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second (unverified, numbers from the A12X).

The Apple A12X included 10 billion transistors (A12 6.9 billion) and the A12Z should be therefore offer a similar amount. This makes it a quite big chip, especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 (3 Billion) or a Skylake desktop quad-core SoC (1.75 Billion).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865+ (Plus)

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in mid 2020. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 3.1 GHz and three additional ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 865 is the faster clocked Prime Core and 10% higher clocked GPU.

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865+ can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 and 865 Plus does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is still called Adreno 650 and should offer 10% more performance than the Adreno 650 in the Snapdragon 865 (thanks to higher clock speed).

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers a KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is also untouched. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 855+ is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

ModelApple A12Z BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameVortex, TempestCortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Apple A12Z Bionic « - 2.49 GHz8 / 8 cores Vortex, Tempest
Apple A12X Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz8 / 8 cores Vortex, Tempest
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G compare2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) « 2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 compare2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Clock <=2490 MHz2420 - 3100 MHz
L1 Cache2 MB1 MB
L2 Cache8 MB1.8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors10000 Million
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory Controller
iGPUApple A12Z Bionic GPUQualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 646 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865+ (Plus)
min: 1.165     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (90%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 40279     avg: 40289     median: 40289 (34%)     max: 40299 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4159     avg: 4965     median: 4971 (19%)     max: 5751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4178     avg: 4805     median: 4642 (53%)     max: 5686 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1117     avg: 1122     median: 1122 (47%)     max: 1127 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4707     avg: 4710     median: 4709.5 (8%)     max: 4712 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4493 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13066 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
646 ms (1%)
min: 1854     avg: 1908     median: 1915.5 (2%)     max: 1947 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
125 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
114 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 42372     avg: 42618     median: 42425 (38%)     max: 43057 Points
min: 25953     avg: 26679     median: 26700.5 (24%)     max: 27360 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 140     avg: 158.3     median: 141 (29%)     max: 194 Points
min: 114     avg: 119.8     median: 119.5 (25%)     max: 126 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 77253     avg: 77589     median: 77588.5 (65%)     max: 77924 Points
min: 88971     avg: 94678     median: 93828.5 (78%)     max: 102085 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 74998     avg: 92841     median: 92841 (75%)     max: 110684 Points
min: 89245     avg: 96058     median: 93220.5 (75%)     max: 108544 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 373781     avg: 375589     median: 375589 (69%)     max: 377397 Points
min: 151143     avg: 216590     median: 237021 (44%)     max: 241176 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 185841     avg: 186014     median: 186014 (67%)     max: 186186 Points
min: 153754     avg: 164286     median: 162562 (59%)     max: 178268 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 712218     avg: 732032     median: 732032 (71%)     max: 751846 Points
min: 490260     avg: 571612     median: 586650 (57%)     max: 622888 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 7692     avg: 7804     median: 7803.5 (41%)     max: 7915 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 19601     avg: 20152     median: 20152 (43%)     max: 20703 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12355     avg: 13143     median: 12534.5 (82%)     max: 14979 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 13629     avg: 15404     median: 14606 (73%)     max: 19824 Points

Average Benchmarks Apple A12Z Bionic → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) → 88% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 12:54:56

#0 checking url part for id 11937 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12716 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11937 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 11937 +0.008s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12716 +0.014s ... 0.049s

#9 got single benchmarks 12716 +0.016s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.154s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.178s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)