Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10 Pro-7350B vs AMD A12-9700P

AMD A10 Pro-7350B

► remove from comparison AMD A10 Pro-7350B

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) quad-core processor based on the Kaveri architecture. It was revealed in June 2014 for notebooks and is manufactured by GlobalFoundries using a 28 nm SHP process. In addition to having two CPU modules for a total of four integer cores clocked at 2.1 - 3.3 GHz, the AMD chip also integrates a Radeon R6 GPU clocked at up to 553 MHz with 384 GCN shaders and a dual-channel DDR3-1600 memory controller.

Technically, the 7350B is almost identical with the consumer model FX-7500. However, AMD guarantees an especially high stability and durability for the business-oriented Pro-Series.

Architecture 

Kaveri is the successor to the 2013 Richland architecture (e.g. A10-5750M). The revised CPU cores, codenamed Steamroller, represent the third generation of the module-based Bulldozer design. A number of major changes include modified decoders (now one per integer core), optimized branch prediction, and increased L1 I-cache from 64 KB to 96 KB per module. These revisions boost the performance per clock slightly over a similarly clocked Richland APU. For more details about the AMD Kaveri architecture, see our detailed analysis here:

Analysis of the AMD Kaveri Notebook Platform

Performance 

According to our benchmarks (shown below), the A10 Pro-7350B offers a CPU performance level similar to the Haswell-based Intel Core i3-4100U. Overall, the 7350B will be sufficient for all daily workloads (Office, Internet browsing, multimedia) as well as light multitasking.

Graphics

The Radeon R6 (Kaveri) GPU of the A10 Pro-7350B features a core clock of up to 553 MHz and 384 shader units. Since the GPU is based on AMD's GCN 1.1 architecture, both DirectX 11.2 "Tier 2" and Mantle are supported. Furthermore, the GPU can be used for general purpose computing in various applications, such as Adobe Photoshop via the OpenCL API. 

In terms of 3D performance, the GPU is almost as fast as a dedicated GeForce GT 720M and can handle many current games at low or medium settings at (W)XGA resolution.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 19 Watts, which is somewhat above the Haswell ULV CPUs from Intel (15 W including chipset). Nevertheless, the A10 Pro-7350B is suited for 12 - 13-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD A10 Pro-7350BAMD A12-9700P
CodenameKaveriBristol Ridge
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD Bristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-7600P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7400P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7200P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-7500 compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10 Pro-7350B « 2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7300 compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8 Pro-7150B compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7100 compare1.8 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6 Pro-7050B compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-7000 compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2100 - 3300 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP19 Watt15 Watt
Transistors2410 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
Die Size245 mm2250 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) (? - 553 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comproducts.amd.com
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketFP4

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 151     avg: 160     median: 162 (1%)     max: 167 Points
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 49     avg: 55.3     median: 55 (15%)     max: 62 Points
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (22%)     max: 80 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.91 Points
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.63     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.7 Points
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1907     avg: 2004     median: 2003.5 (12%)     max: 2100 Points
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4951     avg: 5276     median: 5275.5 (4%)     max: 5600 Points
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6750     avg: 7166     median: 7166 (5%)     max: 7582 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2573     avg: 2685     median: 2684.5 (3%)     max: 2796 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
914 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
23.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1456     avg: 1484     median: 1484 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.18     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (0%)     max: 12.98 fps
16.7 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 65.4     avg: 68.1     median: 68.1 (2%)     max: 70.8 fps
84.6 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.132     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.158 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.202     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2506     avg: 2525     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 2544 Points
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.46     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (5%)     max: 25.42 s
19.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 63     avg: 64.6     median: 64.6 (3%)     max: 66.1 s
42.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1532     avg: 1574     median: 1574 (7%)     max: 1616 s
980 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5498     avg: 5533     median: 5533 (4%)     max: 5568 Points
7608 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1812     avg: 1984     median: 2066 (5%)     max: 2075 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (6%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16380     avg: 17970     median: 18395 (15%)     max: 19136 Points
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
27373 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1395     avg: 1528     median: 1576 (4%)     max: 1613 Points
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1940     avg: 2129     median: 2193 (4%)     max: 2254 Points
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2158 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4899 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3733     avg: 3869     median: 3868.5 (7%)     max: 4004 Points
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1390     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (19%)     max: 1508 Points
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (27%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2308 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2728 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2660 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3786 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4812 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3814 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19404 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10 Pro-7350B → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 137% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 01. 23:47:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5994 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759355262s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5994 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 5994 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.048s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)