, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A10-8700P vs AMD A8-8600P

AMD A10-8700P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-8700P

The AMD A10-8700P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A8-8600P

► remove from comparison AMD A8-8600P

The AMD A8-8600P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC that contains two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding). Compared to the faster A10-8700P, the A8-8600P features a slower clocked CPU and GPU.

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. The faster Carrizo models gain about 35% in 3DMark 11 depending on the cTDP and results for the A8-8600P model should be similar.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A10-8700PAMD A8-8600P
AMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizo
Series: Carrizo Carrizo
AMD FX-8800P compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B compare2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B compare1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B compare1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
1800 - 3200 MHz1600 - 3000 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
12 - 35 12-35
3100 3100
28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Carrizo A10-8700P

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 190     median: 194 (2%)     max: 198 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180185.72187.66187.61185185.52184.81184.94185.64184.5185.13185.13184.77184.64183.42183.65184.48183.81182.41182.5184.13Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (25%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.12     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (4%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.68     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (27%)     max: 0.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2170     avg: 2294     median: 2334 (21%)     max: 2389
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4808     avg: 6140     median: 6394 (10%)     max: 6443
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8279     avg: 8769     median: 8924.5 (9%)     max: 8949 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3080     avg: 3212     median: 3251.5 (23%)     max: 3264 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 507.427     avg: 536     median: 509.4 (6%)     max: 591.003 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.564     avg: 17.1     median: 17.2 (3%)     max: 17.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1316     median: 1328 (9%)     max: 1328
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (7%)     max: 15.23 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72.24     avg: 73.5     median: 73.7 (22%)     max: 74.41 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.18     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (6%)     max: 0.188 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.28     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.303 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (6%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2776     avg: 2985     median: 2977.5 (16%)     max: 3186 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.909     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 22.254 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.382     avg: 46.1     median: 44.8 (2%)     max: 50.362 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 954.493     avg: 985     median: 963.8 (4%)     max: 1071.86 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6309     avg: 6653     median: 6586 (8%)     max: 7129 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1794     avg: 2134     median: 2150.5 (8%)     max: 2310 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13862     avg: 19941     median: 20873.5 (13%)     max: 22998 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 13248     avg: 20904     median: 21997.5 (23%)     max: 23111 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (24%)     max: 24168 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1774     avg: 1897     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2456     avg: 2673     median: 2685 (7%)     max: 2803 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4550     avg: 4670     median: 4676.5 (8%)     max: 4775
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1941     avg: 1974     median: 1975 (41%)     max: 2006
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (8%)     max: 5105
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (44%)     max: 2170
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2229.4     avg: 2673     median: 2285.5 (4%)     max: 3488.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164.3 (2%)     max: 363.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8324     avg: 11931     median: 11800 (17%)     max: 15801 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-8700P → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 16:20:46

#0 checking url part for id 6845 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6846 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6845 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 6845 +0.018s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6846 +0s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 6846 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)