Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium 977 vs Intel Core i5-540M

Intel Pentium 977

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium 977 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, Virtualization (VT-x, VT-d), HyperThreading, AES or Trusted Execution are deactivated. The Pentium 977 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked from 350 - 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 977 is a bit above a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore higher than a 1.3 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 957 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Core i5-540M

► remove from comparison Intel 540M

The Intel Core i5-540M is a mid-range dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 3.06 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 540M only has 3 MB Level 3 Cache and a lower clock speed.

A feature of the new Core i5-540M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-540M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-540M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

ModelIntel Pentium 977Intel Core i5-540M
CodenameSandy BridgeArrandale
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Core i5
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B970 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B960 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B940 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 977 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 967 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M compare2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M compare2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M compare2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M « 2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M compare2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M compare2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M compare2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M compare2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM compare1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM compare1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM compare1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM compare1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM compare1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock1400 MHz2530 - 3066 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1288, PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 733MHz,
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB2500
Transistors382+177 Million
Die Size81+114 mm2
$257 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
977 +
1.1 Points (1%)
204%
540M +
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 977 +
0.6 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 540M +
min: 3061     avg: 3141     median: 3132.5 (19%)     max: 3214 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 540M +
min: 6545     avg: 6950     median: 7030.5 (5%)     max: 7211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
977 +
min: 4320     avg: 4336     median: 4335.5 (3%)     max: 4351 Points
194%
540M +
min: 7844     avg: 8349     median: 8408 (5%)     max: 8600 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
977 +
min: 2285     avg: 2289     median: 2288.5 (3%)     max: 2292 Points
172%
540M +
min: 3237     avg: 3785     median: 3938 (5%)     max: 3991 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
977 +
1616 s (19%)
280%
540M +
min: 569     avg: 740     median: 577 (7%)     max: 1352 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
977 +
56 s (11%)
303%
540M +
min: 18.1     avg: 18.8     median: 18.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 977 +
1059 Points (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 977 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 977 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 977 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
977 +
1435 Points (3%)
197%
540M +
min: 2643     avg: 2814     median: 2826 (6%)     max: 2905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
977 +
27 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
977 +
61 s (3%)
169%
540M +
min: 35     avg: 36.2     median: 36 (2%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
977 +
1400 s (6%)
165%
540M +
min: 822     avg: 848     median: 850 (4%)     max: 867 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 540M +
min: 32820     avg: 34953     median: 33495 (16%)     max: 40000 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 540M +
min: 26630     avg: 27546     median: 26815 (21%)     max: 29923 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 540M +
min: 6030     avg: 6499     median: 6498.5 (13%)     max: 6967 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
977 +
4.7 Points (60%)
140%
540M +
min: 5.2     avg: 6.4     median: 6.6 (85%)     max: 6.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
977 +
3557 Points (3%)
222%
540M +
min: 7801     avg: 7897     median: 7904 (6%)     max: 7994 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium 977 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-540M → 202% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 06. 17:20:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3059 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 533 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751815213s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3059 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 3059 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 533 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 533 +0.01s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)