Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 vs Apple A5

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad

► remove from comparison Samsung 4412 Quad

The Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (also called Exynos 4412, introduced in 2012) is an ARM SoC for tablets and smartphones. It includes a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A9 architecture (including NEON SIMD extension), which clocks with 1.4 to 1.6 GHz (depending on the model). Thus, the computing power is similar to competitors like Nvidia's Tegra 3 SoC. The memory controller supports LPDDR2, DDR2 and DDR3 with a maximum of two 32-bit channels and 400 MHz clock speed, resulting in a bandwidth of up to 6.4 GB/s.

The SoC integrates an ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU (15.8 GFLOPS at 440 MHz). Typical smartphone games (2012) will run fluently even in high resolutions like 1280 x 720 pixels. Videos can be accelerated by a multi-format video decoder (1080p AVI, WMV, H.264, H.263, VC1, MPEG2, MPEG4).

The chip is produced in Samsung fabs in 32nm HKMG and mainly found in high-end devices like the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Note 2. Depending on the clock speed, the power consumption should be between 2 and 4 W (estimated).

Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

► remove from comparison  OMAP 4430

The Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4430 is a SoC with two ARM Cortex-A9 cores including NEON SIMD engine, two Cortex M3 cores (to save power), a PowerVR SGX540 graphics card (304-365 MHz) and a dual channel LPDDR2 memory controller (max 400 MHz).

Apple A5

► remove from comparison

The Apple A5 is a dual-core processor that contains two Cortex A9 cores. Each core is max. clocked at 900 MHz. Furthermore, the A5 integrates a relative fast PowerVR SGX 543MP2 graphics card and 512MB ram (in the same package for the iPad 2). Apple states a maximum of 2x the performance compared to the previous single core Apple A4.

ModelSamsung Exynos 4412 QuadTexas Instruments OMAP 4430Apple A5
SeriesSamsung Exynos Apple
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 « 1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHzcores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44701.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44601.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM281551.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Apple A5x1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Apple A5 « 1 GHzcores Cortex A9
Clock1400 - 1600 MHz1000 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 22
Technology32 nm45 nm40, 32 nm
FeaturesNEON, Mali 400MP4, Memory ControllerDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.ti.com
L1 Cache1 MB
TDP0.6 Watt

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 8282     avg: 9127     median: 9127 (7%)     max: 9972 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 613     avg: 693     median: 698 (6%)     max: 795 Points
191 Points (2%)
46%
A5 +
min: 297     avg: 317.7     median: 323 (3%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 783     avg: 1234     median: 1282 (12%)     max: 1646 Points
923 Points (8%)
65%
A5 +
min: 751     avg: 807     median: 833 (8%)     max: 838 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2661     avg: 2896     median: 2911.5 (6%)     max: 3171 Points
183 Points (0%)
31%
A5 +
min: 737     avg: 855     median: 906 (2%)     max: 923 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1537     avg: 1675     median: 1656.5 (3%)     max: 1816 Points
449 Points (1%)
41%
A5 +
min: 552     avg: 638     median: 671 (1%)     max: 691 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1804     avg: 1915     median: 1886.5 (5%)     max: 2146 Points
424 Points (1%)
40%
A5 +
min: 631     avg: 715     median: 750 (2%)     max: 764 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 69.8     avg: 148.8     median: 162.8 (6%)     max: 202.1 MFLOPS
min: 38.78     avg: 59.5     median: 63.7 (2%)     max: 71.9 MFLOPS
78%
A5 +
min: 124.4     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (4%)     max: 129.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 53.2     avg: 58.4     median: 56.3 (6%)     max: 66.9 MFLOPS
min: 36.48     avg: 40.8     median: 40.6 (4%)     max: 45.39 MFLOPS
145%
A5 +
min: 78.1     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (8%)     max: 85.4 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1109 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1027     avg: 1304     median: 1353 (13%)     max: 1574 ms
min: 1761     avg: 1955     median: 1895.5 (18%)     max: 2269 ms
94%
A5 +
min: 1557     avg: 1863     median: 1888.5 (18%)     max: 2118 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4918     avg: 5460     median: 5357 (12%)     max: 6207 points
min: 2475     avg: 2571     median: 2571 (6%)     max: 2666 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4282     avg: 6753     median: 7142.5 (46%)     max: 7770 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
289 Iter./s (9%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
10134 Iter./s (33%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10466 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 → 45% n=8

Average Benchmarks Apple A5 → 68% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 11. 07:33:18

#0 checking url part for id 3331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3004 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2331 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:38:24 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.11s ... 0.111s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.111s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3331 +0.004s ... 0.115s

#8 got single benchmarks 3331 +0.02s ... 0.136s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3004 +0.004s ... 0.14s

#10 got single benchmarks 3004 +0.016s ... 0.155s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2331 +0.004s ... 0.159s

#12 got single benchmarks 2331 +0.009s ... 0.168s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.168s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.115s ... 0.283s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.283s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)